Welcome Guest

Technically true

Posted on: January 10, 2019 at 14:27:29 CT

Mormad MU

Posts:

56714

Member For:

18.73 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

Greitens' threat of revenge porn caused law-makers to pass a law that makes actually doing it to be a crime, interrupting the supply chain for nosy friends everywhere in MO.

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

Revenge porn law a la Eric Greitens already - MrBlueSky MU - 1/10 14:02:07

Holy fvck. I just looked at the article. I know him - TigerMatt STL - 1/10 15:06:24

Is she the one with the restraining order?(nm) - Mormad MU - 1/10 15:08:20

Can't tell yet. I hadn't heard anything about a restraining - TigerMatt STL - 1/10 15:13:32

He is works with a high school classmate of mine too - TigerMatt STL - 1/10 15:17:09

tell me how that relates to Greitens(nm) - dangertim MU

- 1/10 14:12:59

The law was passed in Missouri immediately following - MrBlueSky MU - 1/10 14:15:57

so it relates to him because he signed it. got it(nm) - dangertim MU

- 1/10 14:22:14

No...the bill was proposed as a result of the situation with - MrBlueSky MU - 1/10 14:22:47

the situation where there was no revenge porn?(nm) - dangertim MU

- 1/10 14:23:25

Technically true - Mormad MU - 1/10 14:27:29

so if the law was passed 2 years prior, it still would have - dangertim MU

- 1/10 14:29:04

I guess it depends on what he means by "a la Greitens" - Mormad MU - 1/10 14:32:03

i think threatening to transmit the pics is a violation - gmmm98 MU

- 1/10 14:39:47

UnderprivilegedText(nm) - dangertim MU

- 1/10 14:35:08

That seems to target the poors.... - Mormad MU - 1/10 14:37:56

please leave cnk out of this(nm) - dangertim MU

- 1/10 14:39:32

yeah!(nm) - cnk ATL - 1/10 14:51:38

Bad law.(nm) - TigerMatt STL - 1/10 14:05:29

Should there be no penalty for sharing - MrBlueSky MU - 1/10 14:08:02

If you send nudes, you should always weigh in that others - TigerMatt STL - 1/10 14:30:29

Greitens, and my example below - MrBlueSky MU - 1/10 14:31:09

lol, and? (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 1/10 14:50:00

So? No physical harm or property damage was done. It - TigerMatt STL - 1/10 14:32:36

So there is never a victim unless it's physical harm? - MrBlueSky MU - 1/10 14:35:01

Is it criminal if I tell you a secret and you share that wit - TigerMatt STL - 1/10 14:38:14

Buddy Code Violation right there, TigerM - Mormad MU - 1/10 14:40:04

Cutting in line creates a victim - ummmm MU - 1/10 14:35:57

For someone who loves to call out red herrings - MrBlueSky MU - 1/10 14:36:41

your lack of understanding of fallacies and logic is - 90Tiger MU - 1/10 14:50:41

What if I am cheating on my wife. I send a screenshot of - TigerMatt STL - 1/10 14:42:33

So intent based? - Mormad MU - 1/10 14:45:10

are you lqf2b8's best man?(nm) - dangertim MU

- 1/10 14:52:25

The action is the same. Non-consensual sharing of something - TigerMatt STL - 1/10 14:48:12

Apparently, it can be now - Mormad MU - 1/10 14:51:11

No doubt the guy is a d-bag. But let's not throw around the - ummmm MU - 1/10 15:08:59

the discussion isn't about whether he's a d-bag (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 1/10 14:54:46

Armchair jailing of people is another really bad part of - ummmm MU - 1/10 15:12:01

How has he been armchair jailed? - Mormad MU - 1/10 15:18:03

When people sit around and go: - ummmm MU - 1/10 15:22:13

Again...a conversation between lovers - MrBlueSky MU - 1/10 14:43:26

Why? It is the same principle. (nm) - TigerMatt STL - 1/10 14:46:15

Disagree (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 1/10 14:47:42

Lol, why? gods below you're daft (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 1/10 14:51:09

You're not that far off from that. - ummmm MU - 1/10 14:46:00

A naked photo is not the same as a text conversation - MrBlueSky MU - 1/10 14:47:35

And if you publically shared a text I sent you that I am gay - TigerMatt STL - 1/10 14:50:07

More arbitrariness. By the way, what kind of criminal - ummmm MU - 1/10 14:49:50

This law is specifically written to address non-consensual - MrBlueSky MU - 1/10 14:53:15

What if it's "art"? - Mormad MU - 1/10 14:55:20

What if I am in the picture and Photoshop her face blurry - TigerMatt STL - 1/10 15:00:17

Hmmm, I'd surmise that you're ok in that situation - Mormad MU - 1/10 15:03:15

Do you think it should call for jail time? (nm) - ummmm MU - 1/10 14:53:44

what if mistress said "tonight" with a nude selfie in the - dangertim MU

- 1/10 14:48:34

I was demonstrating an example where there are victims - ummmm MU - 1/10 14:37:45

Cutting in line is far different from sharing personal - MrBlueSky MU - 1/10 14:41:53

he's trying to get you to understand that you can't - 90Tiger MU - 1/10 14:52:37

The problem is the arbitrariness to lines - ummmm MU - 1/10 14:45:03

Probably not a criminal penalty - ummmm MU - 1/10 14:24:55

An individual took naked photos of a significant other - MrBlueSky MU - 1/10 14:28:08

No criminal penalty. Invasion of privacy, possibly. - ummmm MU - 1/10 14:33:12

aren't there already invasion of privacy laws?(nm) - dangertim MU

- 1/10 14:29:52

The specific law here speaks to the non-consensual - MrBlueSky MU - 1/10 14:30:31

Otherwise it's just pron(nm) - Mormad MU - 1/10 14:33:21

was the current invasion of privacy law insufficient to - dangertim MU

- 1/10 14:32:44

it's like "hate crime" - a law exists against the infringeme - 90Tiger MU - 1/10 14:54:16

what if somebody said that somebody said that they have - dangertim MU

- 1/10 14:13:38