If a wall addressed any of the root causes of illegal
Posted on: January 2, 2019 at 11:59:08 CT
Badird MU
Posts:
8826
Member For:
9.60 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
immigration, it would be worth considering. But it doesnt. Therefore, it is a waste of resources. Your question of "how much should we pay to protect the borders" is silly. How much should MORE should we spend? Id argue that passing legislation that actually addresses the root causes and issues with immigration is a more worthy cause, and will allow us to CUT some of the spending while decreasing illegal immigration.
From an article posted in this thread:
During his confirmation hearing earlier this month, newly-minted DHS Secretary Gen. John Kelly said that "a physical barrier in and of itself will not do the job."
"It has to be a layered defense," he said, adding that even with a wall extending from the Pacific Ocean to the Gulf of Mexico, you would still have to back that wall up with patrolling by human beings, sensors and observation devices, he said.
Border Patrol already employs a "digital wall" composed of about 8,000 cameras, which monitor the southern fence and ports of entry. Its resources also include more than 11,000 underground senors, 107 aircraft, eight drones, 175 mobile surveillance units and 84 boats.
“We can spend billions of dollars to build a 10-foot wall on top of a 10,000-foot mountain,” former DHS Secretary Jeh Johnson said in November, “but if you’ve come all the way from Central America, it’s not going to stop you.”