Welcome Guest

Sign In | Register

RE: Bryant is not a great passer. He is a decent passer in a

Posted on: December 6, 2018 at 21:09:35 CT

JG MU

Posts:

256794

Member For:

21.64 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

126

Lock had a very good SR year, particularly the second half
but his first three years he wasn't all that and a bag of chips, IMO.

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

Never really watched Clemson last year. Did they - Ozark Apple MU - 12/6 19:12:05

IMO, the fair way to answer that is to say that they had - jumbo73 MU - 12/6 20:23:12

Phil Steele's Numbers: - ScottsdaleTiger MU - 12/6 21:10:32

RE: Phil Steele's Numbers: - Ragarm MU - 12/7 08:54:30

I just wondered because I hear about Bryant’s numbers - Ozark Apple MU - 12/6 20:34:26

Bryant is not a great passer. He is a decent passer in a - alwaysright MU - 12/6 20:40:47

Somebody else compared him to James Franklin - BigDave MU - 12/7 08:37:10

this might be true. - alwaysright MU - 12/7 17:17:59

RE: Bryant is not a great passer. He is a decent passer in a - MenInBlack MU - 12/7 08:35:01

A little context. - alwaysright MU - 12/7 17:13:17

RE: Bryant is not a great passer. He is a decent passer in a - JG A - 12/6 21:09:35

For the sake of this comparison, only Lock's Sr year - alwaysright MU - 12/7 07:05:03

Then how good a scrambler is he compared to Brad Smith(nm) - Ozark Apple MU - 12/6 20:56:05

brad smith was a game breaker with his legs. If he has legs - SabertoothTiger MU - 12/7 00:12:45

I think WR speed can make up for weak long ball passing. - GA Tiger MU - 12/6 20:54:52

I only asked bc some fool argues Dooleys influence on lock - Ozark Apple MU - 12/6 20:50:27

yes(nm) - MizzouAstro MU

- 12/6 20:03:22

©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy About Tigerboard