Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

RE: The law assumes facts not in evidence

Posted on: November 20, 2018 at 11:25:44 CT
MOCO SON MU
Posts:
29630
Member For:
8.62 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
Law also doesn't understand that if individuals are in this Country "illegally" they may be removed from this Country ASAP!
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

What is the purpose of a legal port of entry - tman MU - 11/20 11:13:45
     RE: What is the purpose of a legal port of entry - None**** MU - 11/20 11:58:32
          But we don't need them if everyone has a right to just - tman MU - 11/20 12:08:59
     Control (nm) - pickle MU - 11/20 11:37:33
     The law assumes facts not in evidence - mu7176grad MU - 11/20 11:19:08
          such as legitimacy of gvmt (nm) - pickle MU - 11/20 12:35:31
          RE: The law assumes facts not in evidence - MOCO SON MU - 11/20 11:25:44
          Or walk through the legal points of entry rather than - Spanky KU - 11/20 11:22:36
     Don't like the law? Change it - MrBlueSky MU - 11/20 11:18:38
          RE: Don't like the law? Change it - None**** MU - 11/20 12:02:44
          Inthink he should use the same authority he used - tman MU - 11/20 11:54:49
          like ... with an executive order? (nm) - Sal KC - 11/20 11:20:11
               So again, Sal is okay when this president makes law with - MrBlueSky MU - 11/20 11:23:40
                    I never said I was OK with it - Sal KC - 11/20 11:24:13
                         You're defending an unlawful EO up and down this board - MrBlueSky MU - 11/20 11:24:56
                              You're even more unhinged today than usual - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 11/20 11:26:52
                                   he really is (nm) - Sal KC - 11/20 11:27:48
                                        Your hypocrisy is strong today - MrBlueSky MU - 11/20 12:05:26
                                             It's not my fault - Sal KC - 11/20 14:26:07
                              I'm not defending the EO - Sal KC - 11/20 11:25:44
                                   His interpretation of the law was correct. - MrBlueSky MU - 11/20 11:27:04
                                        When does an EO take precedent? (nm) - Sal KC - 11/20 11:27:24
                                             When a judge - MrBlueSky MU - 11/20 11:30:28
                                                  So it only takes precedent when somebody you support - Sal KC - 11/20 11:31:11
                                                       If an EO violates law it should not and does not take - MrBlueSky MU - 11/20 11:32:33
                                                            EO's are the force of law (nm) - Sal KC - 11/20 11:40:58
               A pen and a phone no longer work - mu7176grad MU - 11/20 11:22:31
                    I can't get an answer from him in regards - Sal KC - 11/20 11:23:16
                         Must go through Congress - mizzouSECedes STL - 11/20 11:25:37
                              exactly (nm) - Sal KC - 11/20 11:27:39
                         I've answered several times. The Trump admin EO regarding - MrBlueSky MU - 11/20 11:24:24
                              lol says the guy promoting legislating from the bench (nm) - Sal KC - 11/20 11:25:10
                                   The judge's interpretation is still correct - MrBlueSky MU - 11/20 11:30:54
                                        He wasn't interpreting the EO (nm) - Sal KC - 11/20 11:41:38
                                             Correct. I suspect he will rule against - tman MU - 11/20 11:51:27




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard