Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

The law assumes facts not in evidence

Posted on: November 20, 2018 at 11:19:08 CT
mu7176grad MU
Posts:
60392
Member For:
21.83 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
being that people will not climb over fences or ford rivers to sneak in the country,

It presumes they fly in on AA or drive thru the border in a rental car at Blaine Washington
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

What is the purpose of a legal port of entry - tman MU - 11/20 11:13:45
     RE: What is the purpose of a legal port of entry - None**** MU - 11/20 11:58:32
          But we don't need them if everyone has a right to just - tman MU - 11/20 12:08:59
     Control (nm) - pickle MU - 11/20 11:37:33
     The law assumes facts not in evidence - mu7176grad MU - 11/20 11:19:08
          such as legitimacy of gvmt (nm) - pickle MU - 11/20 12:35:31
          RE: The law assumes facts not in evidence - MOCO SON MU - 11/20 11:25:44
          Or walk through the legal points of entry rather than - Spanky KU - 11/20 11:22:36
     Don't like the law? Change it - MrBlueSky MU - 11/20 11:18:38
          RE: Don't like the law? Change it - None**** MU - 11/20 12:02:44
          Inthink he should use the same authority he used - tman MU - 11/20 11:54:49
          like ... with an executive order? (nm) - Sal KC - 11/20 11:20:11
               So again, Sal is okay when this president makes law with - MrBlueSky MU - 11/20 11:23:40
                    I never said I was OK with it - Sal KC - 11/20 11:24:13
                         You're defending an unlawful EO up and down this board - MrBlueSky MU - 11/20 11:24:56
                              You're even more unhinged today than usual - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 11/20 11:26:52
                                   he really is (nm) - Sal KC - 11/20 11:27:48
                                        Your hypocrisy is strong today - MrBlueSky MU - 11/20 12:05:26
                                             It's not my fault - Sal KC - 11/20 14:26:07
                              I'm not defending the EO - Sal KC - 11/20 11:25:44
                                   His interpretation of the law was correct. - MrBlueSky MU - 11/20 11:27:04
                                        When does an EO take precedent? (nm) - Sal KC - 11/20 11:27:24
                                             When a judge - MrBlueSky MU - 11/20 11:30:28
                                                  So it only takes precedent when somebody you support - Sal KC - 11/20 11:31:11
                                                       If an EO violates law it should not and does not take - MrBlueSky MU - 11/20 11:32:33
                                                            EO's are the force of law (nm) - Sal KC - 11/20 11:40:58
               A pen and a phone no longer work - mu7176grad MU - 11/20 11:22:31
                    I can't get an answer from him in regards - Sal KC - 11/20 11:23:16
                         Must go through Congress - mizzouSECedes STL - 11/20 11:25:37
                              exactly (nm) - Sal KC - 11/20 11:27:39
                         I've answered several times. The Trump admin EO regarding - MrBlueSky MU - 11/20 11:24:24
                              lol says the guy promoting legislating from the bench (nm) - Sal KC - 11/20 11:25:10
                                   The judge's interpretation is still correct - MrBlueSky MU - 11/20 11:30:54
                                        He wasn't interpreting the EO (nm) - Sal KC - 11/20 11:41:38
                                             Correct. I suspect he will rule against - tman MU - 11/20 11:51:27




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard