Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

No and that is a good question. If payments are not

Posted on: February 24, 2018 at 04:52:08 CT
LONGTIMETIGERFAN MU
Posts:
104
Member For:
20.26 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
controlled players will always go to who pays them the most. While that is good for the player, that would not be good for the game. It would be professional sports without salary caps and luxury taxes. Likewise, sports other than football and maybe basketball would be a huge disadvantage. Money generated by endowments could be given directly to players and would by pass each schools athletics department. If payments are already being made to players it partially explains why the Dukes and Kentuckys and North Carolinas are always getting the best players.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Is paying players really a solution? - LONGTIMETIGERFAN MU - 2/24 04:03:57
     We should not be paying players. They should not have to - Tiger_1995 MU - 2/24 10:10:01
     Nope, allow them to get.loans based on future earnings - tigerinhogtown STL - 2/24 09:34:15
     Its a terrible idea. We already have pro teams anyway.(nm) - GA Tiger MU - 2/24 09:00:57
     ncaa players should be forced to do fund raisers like - MrTruman2U MU - 2/24 08:48:52
     A 100% solution? No. But I think it could help the - tgr MU - 2/24 08:18:54
          It's closer to a ZERO percent solution. Pay players and - tigerdb MU - 2/24 08:45:42
               Yep(nm) - DevilsAdvocate MU - 2/24 08:56:37
     No it’s not - MakeShift MU - 2/24 07:33:21
     Why do payments need to be controlled? - zodiac6 JC - 2/24 04:29:59
          I think a system like the NBA is a good one. - tgr MU - 2/24 08:20:44
               Slippery slope.(nm) - Tiger_1995 MU - 2/24 10:11:52
          No and that is a good question. If payments are not - LONGTIMETIGERFAN MU - 2/24 04:52:08




©2024 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard