Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

The issue here is not the owner but probable cause. In your

Posted on: February 1, 2018 at 10:01:26 CT
DHighlander NWMSU
Posts:
51153
Member For:
16.86 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
example the police would still need probable cause to search the car. IMO if the officer asked for paperwork, saw the car was a rental and that the driver was not listed on that paperwork he would have probable cause right there.

A rental agreement specifies who the owner is authorizing to drive their vehicle. Anyone else behind the wheel does not have permission from the owner.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Gorsuch may be worth the Trump - El-ahrairah BAMA - 2/1 09:23:18
     I like it. Too bad there are way too many so called - hefeweizen MU - 2/1 09:57:48
          Conservatives In Name Only like JG are the worst.(nm) - TigerMatt STL - 2/1 10:08:17
     Essentially this means that if a drug dealer rents a car - JG MU - 2/1 09:52:05
          lol what a dip$hit(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 2/1 10:02:18
          The issue here is not the owner but probable cause. In your - DHighlander NWMSU - 2/1 10:01:26
               It isn't probable cause. The police have no say in a civil - TigerMatt STL - 2/1 10:06:14
                    That is totally different. In your example someone is in - DHighlander NWMSU - 2/1 10:29:41
               So you agree Gorsuch is wrong - JG MU - 2/1 10:02:59
                    I am not well versed enough to say he is wrong and - DHighlander NWMSU - 2/1 10:33:17
                         I agree. that is the reasonable position - JG MU - 2/1 10:52:02
                    ^^^thinks all traffic stops are probable cause to seach(nm) - hefeweizen MU - 2/1 10:03:58
                         LOL Wrong as usual - JG MU - 2/1 10:11:51
                              RE: LOL Wrong as usual - hefeweizen MU - 2/1 10:13:01
          Lol - pickle MU - 2/1 10:01:12
          Proof the true conservative is a big government - TigerMatt STL - 2/1 09:59:52
          without probable cause, yes(nm) - hefeweizen MU - 2/1 09:58:25
               The first probable cause was the traffic stop - JG MU - 2/1 10:00:13
                    Violating a private contract is not illegal. It is a civil - TigerMatt STL - 2/1 10:01:33
                    Incorrect. a traffic stop in and of itself is not probable - hefeweizen MU - 2/1 10:01:04
                         Pay attention - JG MU - 2/1 10:08:37
                              "The first probable cause was the traffic stop" (nm) - hefeweizen MU - 2/1 10:11:01
                                   So if he had a sign in the window saying - GA Tiger MU - 2/1 10:17:45
                              He was not illegally driving the car moron.(nm) - TigerMatt STL - 2/1 10:09:14
                                   He had no authorization to be driving the car - JG MU - 2/1 10:15:08
                                        He had authorization from the renter. That is only - TigerMatt STL - 2/1 10:18:44
                                             Does the renter have the authority to transfer ownership? - DHighlander NWMSU - 2/1 10:40:23
                                        "The first probable cause was the traffic stop" (nm) - hefeweizen MU - 2/1 10:16:24
                                             Proving why you are both stupid and dishonest - JG MU - 2/1 11:10:14
          Of course it’s a conservative position - El-ahrairah BAMA - 2/1 09:55:47
               Yeah its not that cut and dry - JG MU - 2/1 09:58:51
                    The driver was not driving the car illegally.(nm) - TigerMatt STL - 2/1 10:00:35
                         Yes he was - JG MU - 2/1 10:09:01
                              Cite the law violated by him driving the car.(nm) - TigerMatt STL - 2/1 10:09:38
                                   You could make a case for grand theft. He was in possession - DHighlander NWMSU - 2/1 10:42:07
                    lol, this must be the true conservative position(nm) - hefeweizen MU - 2/1 09:59:50
                         Yes it would seem to be the conservative position - JG MU - 2/1 10:00:51
                              it isn't (nm) - pickle MU - 2/1 10:01:33
     That was my biggest point during the last campaign. - DHighlander NWMSU - 2/1 09:37:44
          Court appointees are not permanent (nm) - pickle MU - 2/1 09:58:31
               They have term limits? (nm) - mizzouSECedes STL - 2/1 10:04:11
                    Read the Constitution (nm) - pickle MU - 2/1 10:28:19
                         Why can't you just say - mizzouSECedes STL - 2/1 10:58:39
                              Do you think he post here to further discussions? He is a - DHighlander NWMSU - 2/1 11:17:40
                                   Mr. Constitutionalist, have you rethought your claim? - pickle MU - 2/1 11:32:22
                              Because it doesn't. Read the Constitution - pickle MU - 2/1 11:04:24
          On this particular issue raised in the OP, it is likely that - ummmm MU - 2/1 09:44:27
     Interesting. Here's what I don't like about Gorsuch position - GA Tiger MU - 2/1 09:31:56
          You're horribly wrong - pickle MU - 2/1 10:02:28
          That’s a pretty dumb statement, like Spanky dumb - El-ahrairah BAMA - 2/1 09:57:06
          The govt does not have rights that individuals do not have - ummmm MU - 2/1 09:41:04
               Well, thats one way to define things. So you're saying - GA Tiger MU - 2/1 10:13:35
                    I'm definitely not saying that. (nm) - ummmm MU - 2/1 10:19:39
                         Just make sure you don't say what you meant. That - GA Tiger MU - 2/1 11:54:26
     If I were Gorsuch would skip dinner at the Clintons - mu7176grad MU - 2/1 09:25:07
          May be Trump's best move in 4 years. And I think the very - GA Tiger MU - 2/1 09:33:14




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard