Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

RE: Should we mostly be recruiting 4 and 5 star players? I don't

Posted on: September 8, 2017 at 11:21:41 CT
Ragarm MU
Posts:
20876
Member For:
26.23 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
I think the star system for all the recruiting services should be a lot more accurate for basketball than football. If their evaluators are even remotely decent at it because they have some many opportunities to watch these kids under somewhere near game conditions.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Should we mostly be recruiting 4 and 5 star players? I don't - Tiger_1995 MU - 9/8 09:32:08
     Potential lottery picks only! (kidding) (nm) - mizzou john MU - 9/8 13:49:28
     5 star only. Very few of our 4 star kids have worked out.(nm) - SuperTone MU - 9/8 13:09:00
     You look at the frame, quickness and the game. - catbirdseat MU - 9/8 11:48:38
     RE: Should we mostly be recruiting 4 and 5 star players? I don't - Ragarm MU - 9/8 11:21:41
     If you take ten 4-star players and ten 3-star players - tgr MU - 9/8 10:38:07
          Rivals has subcategories of stars - wu-tangtiger MU - 9/8 11:01:40
               And unranked 3-stars have a much lower chance of success - tgr MU - 9/8 11:13:57
                    RE: And unranked 3-stars have a much lower chance of success - Ragarm MU - 9/8 11:24:36
                         Usually in Rivals players that are 150+ aren't given an - tgr MU - 9/8 11:28:22
     recruit the best players that the coach can get - wu-tangtiger MU - 9/8 10:09:32
     Yes, because - Babble-o MU - 9/8 10:03:22
     Yes(nm) - kcnorthside KC - 9/8 09:49:11




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard