Welcome Guest

Yes, because

Posted on: September 8, 2017 at 10:03:22 CT

Babble-o MU

Posts:

Member For:

9.29 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

Cuonzo and staff will actually land some of them. Sure they're going to miss on guys, but I trust them to reel in a good number of the guys they make a high priority.

For Kim Anderson and crew, they were probably wasting their time.

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

Should we mostly be recruiting 4 and 5 star players? I don't - Tiger_1995 MU - 9/8 09:32:08

Potential lottery picks only! (kidding) (nm) - mizzou john MU

- 9/8 13:49:28

5 star only. Very few of our 4 star kids have worked out.(nm) - SuperTone MU

- 9/8 13:09:00

You look at the frame, quickness and the game. - catbirdseat MU

- 9/8 11:48:38

RE: Should we mostly be recruiting 4 and 5 star players? I don't - Ragarm MU - 9/8 11:21:41

If you take ten 4-star players and ten 3-star players - tgr MU

- 9/8 10:38:07

Rivals has subcategories of stars - wu-tangtiger MU - 9/8 11:01:40

And unranked 3-stars have a much lower chance of success - tgr MU

- 9/8 11:13:57

RE: And unranked 3-stars have a much lower chance of success - Ragarm MU - 9/8 11:24:36

Usually in Rivals players that are 150+ aren't given an - tgr MU

- 9/8 11:28:22

recruit the best players that the coach can get - wu-tangtiger MU - 9/8 10:09:32

Yes, because - Babble-o MU - 9/8 10:03:22

Yes(nm) - kcnorthside KC - 9/8 09:49:11