Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

He's not taking anyone's job. He was hired over whoever

Posted on: June 30, 2017 at 12:35:40 CT
ummmm MU
Posts:
44901
Member For:
12.82 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
else was seeking the position.

The employer wants to employ him.

It is his job until he or the employers says otherwise.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

San Francisco to pay $190,000 to illegal immigrant - MizzouTigerz MU - 6/30 10:33:09
     He isn't taking anyone's job. No one is entitled to a job.(nm) - ummmm MU - 6/30 11:20:24
          Okay. He's taking a job he should not have, as he is - MizzouTigerz MU - 6/30 12:32:23
               He's not taking anyone's job. He was hired over whoever - ummmm MU - 6/30 12:35:40
                    You missed where I changed it to taking 'a job', not taking - MizzouTigerz MU - 6/30 14:31:14
                         He didn't miss anything - pickle MU - 6/30 14:43:21
          Plus the job is property of the employer (nm) - pickle MU - 6/30 11:21:53
               Property? Is the person in the job his property too? - tman KC - 6/30 11:32:30
                    No, the employee is not property. He is a contractor - pickle MU - 6/30 11:48:32
               Under the guidelines set forth by the duly elected federal - DHighlander NWMSU - 6/30 11:32:19
                    No (nm) - pickle MU - 6/30 11:48:50
     Obviously, they don't need federal funds. nm - hokie VT - 6/30 11:18:03
     Liberal insanity (nm) - Fourth and Long MU - 6/30 11:11:22
          No (nm) - pickle MU - 6/30 11:16:13
     He should have gotten a million plus - mu7176grad MU - 6/30 11:01:38
     Yes, you're missing quite a bit - pickle MU - 6/30 10:43:53
          Yes, I'm still missing your serious reply - MizzouTigerz MU - 6/30 12:37:20
               I'm waiting for your proof that god exists - pickle MU - 6/30 12:41:40
     Its the PRC. Thats what you get. And to think - GA Tiger MU - 6/30 10:38:44
          Aren't you for the rule of law? - pickle MU - 6/30 10:45:04
               Article 1 Section 8 and 14th Amendment - Alferd Packer MU - 6/30 10:53:54
                    The word immigration is not in the 14th - pickle MU - 6/30 11:06:33
                         So what? Naturalization is. - Alferd Packer MU - 6/30 11:14:42
                              You are talking to cucumber boy why would you ever expect - DHighlander NWMSU - 6/30 11:19:16
                                   I don't. - Alferd Packer MU - 6/30 11:23:51
                                        I'm the one using facts here - pickle MU - 6/30 11:27:20
                                             No. You are using your opinion. - Alferd Packer MU - 6/30 11:45:51
                                                  No, I'm using fact and a literal reading - pickle MU - 6/30 11:49:26
                                                       No. It's just your opinion. - Alferd Packer MU - 6/30 12:32:45
                                                            It is a fact that the word "immigration" - pickle MU - 6/30 12:43:29
                              Naturalization in no way implies immigration - pickle MU - 6/30 11:16:49
                                   "establish an uniform rule of naturalization" - Alferd Packer MU - 6/30 11:22:49
                                        You're doing what liberal SCOTUS justices do. - ummmm MU - 6/30 11:28:14
                                             He is repeating what has already been decided - tman KC - 6/30 11:35:33
                                                  No he isn't (nm) - pickle MU - 6/30 11:50:28
                                                  No, he's not. The federal power to control immigration - ummmm MU - 6/30 11:40:31
                                             You will find zero legal authorities who agree with that - DHighlander NWMSU - 6/30 11:34:22
                                                  i love it when a self-proclaimed conservative falls back on - 90Tiger MU - 6/30 11:57:21
                                                  You're wrong, in part. - ummmm MU - 6/30 11:39:00
                                                       So where did that say that states had authority over - DHighlander NWMSU - 6/30 12:04:04
                                                            RE: So where did that say that states had authority over - ummmm MU - 6/30 12:17:53
                                                                 He's read the Constitution, you know - pickle MU - 6/30 12:21:36
                                                                      he's a ****ing stooge, and a teacher (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 6/30 14:50:09
                                                            LMFAO!!!! - pickle MU - 6/30 12:09:29
                                                            holy ****ing **** - seriously? any power not specifically - 90Tiger MU - 6/30 12:05:43
                                                                 Classic DH (nm) - pickle MU - 6/30 12:12:03
                                        That is incorrect. And you're using circular reasoning - pickle MU - 6/30 11:26:06
                                             Doesn't matter. Congress can make laws governing - Alferd Packer MU - 6/30 11:38:25
                                                  More circular reasoning. You are wrong (nm) - pickle MU - 6/30 11:49:54
                                                       How is it "circular?"(nm) - Alferd Packer MU - 6/30 12:53:48
               Nor would it then be permitted to write - GA Tiger MU - 6/30 10:49:24
                    That's correct. But let's stay on topic here - pickle MU - 6/30 10:53:04
     That may be the most retarded thing since - JG MU - 6/30 10:34:27




©2024 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard