Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

No, the employee is not property. He is a contractor

Posted on: June 30, 2017 at 11:48:32 CT
pickle MU
Posts:
265867
Member For:
25.80 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
4
who had entered an agreement to exchange time, skill, labor, for a wage or other compensation

What is your point?
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

San Francisco to pay $190,000 to illegal immigrant - MizzouTigerz MU - 6/30 10:33:09
     He isn't taking anyone's job. No one is entitled to a job.(nm) - ummmm MU - 6/30 11:20:24
          Okay. He's taking a job he should not have, as he is - MizzouTigerz MU - 6/30 12:32:23
               He's not taking anyone's job. He was hired over whoever - ummmm MU - 6/30 12:35:40
                    You missed where I changed it to taking 'a job', not taking - MizzouTigerz MU - 6/30 14:31:14
                         He didn't miss anything - pickle MU - 6/30 14:43:21
          Plus the job is property of the employer (nm) - pickle MU - 6/30 11:21:53
               Property? Is the person in the job his property too? - tman KC - 6/30 11:32:30
                    No, the employee is not property. He is a contractor - pickle MU - 6/30 11:48:32
               Under the guidelines set forth by the duly elected federal - DHighlander NWMSU - 6/30 11:32:19
                    No (nm) - pickle MU - 6/30 11:48:50
     Obviously, they don't need federal funds. nm - hokie VT - 6/30 11:18:03
     Liberal insanity (nm) - Fourth and Long MU - 6/30 11:11:22
          No (nm) - pickle MU - 6/30 11:16:13
     He should have gotten a million plus - mu7176grad MU - 6/30 11:01:38
     Yes, you're missing quite a bit - pickle MU - 6/30 10:43:53
          Yes, I'm still missing your serious reply - MizzouTigerz MU - 6/30 12:37:20
               I'm waiting for your proof that god exists - pickle MU - 6/30 12:41:40
     Its the PRC. Thats what you get. And to think - GA Tiger MU - 6/30 10:38:44
          Aren't you for the rule of law? - pickle MU - 6/30 10:45:04
               Article 1 Section 8 and 14th Amendment - Alferd Packer MU - 6/30 10:53:54
                    The word immigration is not in the 14th - pickle MU - 6/30 11:06:33
                         So what? Naturalization is. - Alferd Packer MU - 6/30 11:14:42
                              You are talking to cucumber boy why would you ever expect - DHighlander NWMSU - 6/30 11:19:16
                                   I don't. - Alferd Packer MU - 6/30 11:23:51
                                        I'm the one using facts here - pickle MU - 6/30 11:27:20
                                             No. You are using your opinion. - Alferd Packer MU - 6/30 11:45:51
                                                  No, I'm using fact and a literal reading - pickle MU - 6/30 11:49:26
                                                       No. It's just your opinion. - Alferd Packer MU - 6/30 12:32:45
                                                            It is a fact that the word "immigration" - pickle MU - 6/30 12:43:29
                              Naturalization in no way implies immigration - pickle MU - 6/30 11:16:49
                                   "establish an uniform rule of naturalization" - Alferd Packer MU - 6/30 11:22:49
                                        You're doing what liberal SCOTUS justices do. - ummmm MU - 6/30 11:28:14
                                             He is repeating what has already been decided - tman KC - 6/30 11:35:33
                                                  No he isn't (nm) - pickle MU - 6/30 11:50:28
                                                  No, he's not. The federal power to control immigration - ummmm MU - 6/30 11:40:31
                                             You will find zero legal authorities who agree with that - DHighlander NWMSU - 6/30 11:34:22
                                                  i love it when a self-proclaimed conservative falls back on - 90Tiger MU - 6/30 11:57:21
                                                  You're wrong, in part. - ummmm MU - 6/30 11:39:00
                                                       So where did that say that states had authority over - DHighlander NWMSU - 6/30 12:04:04
                                                            RE: So where did that say that states had authority over - ummmm MU - 6/30 12:17:53
                                                                 He's read the Constitution, you know - pickle MU - 6/30 12:21:36
                                                                      he's a ****ing stooge, and a teacher (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 6/30 14:50:09
                                                            LMFAO!!!! - pickle MU - 6/30 12:09:29
                                                            holy ****ing **** - seriously? any power not specifically - 90Tiger MU - 6/30 12:05:43
                                                                 Classic DH (nm) - pickle MU - 6/30 12:12:03
                                        That is incorrect. And you're using circular reasoning - pickle MU - 6/30 11:26:06
                                             Doesn't matter. Congress can make laws governing - Alferd Packer MU - 6/30 11:38:25
                                                  More circular reasoning. You are wrong (nm) - pickle MU - 6/30 11:49:54
                                                       How is it "circular?"(nm) - Alferd Packer MU - 6/30 12:53:48
               Nor would it then be permitted to write - GA Tiger MU - 6/30 10:49:24
                    That's correct. But let's stay on topic here - pickle MU - 6/30 10:53:04
     That may be the most retarded thing since - JG MU - 6/30 10:34:27




©2024 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard