Welcome Guest

Not at all, but once in our jurisdiction and controlled by

Posted on: April 17, 2017 at 15:58:37 CT
Mo Texan MU
Posts:
20130
Member For:
22.22 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
us as in this case it could be argued that our failure to deport them placed them in a position to be heard.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

     What was the vote split? - JG MU - 4/17 17:20:12
          I can't imagine any of the Democrat appointed justices - Spanky KU - 4/17 19:00:12
     It's too bad that the court has to weigh in on the obvious - Tigerfish MU - 4/17 15:42:09
          Good lord, you're ignorant - pickle MU - 4/17 17:52:15
          You might want to read the 14th Amendment - Mo Texan MU - 4/17 15:37:34
               Which has nothing to do with BEING ABLE TO LIVE HERE - GA Tiger MU - 4/17 15:50:56
                    It was written for people. - DC Jayhawk KU - 4/17 16:10:11
                    Yell more little guy - Mo Texan MU - 4/17 15:52:34
                         thats cool you find other men cute(nm) - MizSecZou MU - 4/17 16:47:18
                              And ?(nm) - Mo Texan MU - 4/17 17:41:44
                                   you like... - MizSecZou MU - 4/17 20:10:09
               You might want to read the ruling - Spanky KU - 4/17 15:41:22
                    My post is in reference to his remark that the US - Mo Texan MU - 4/17 15:47:21
                         Fair enough.... it is a very valid point. - Spanky KU - 4/17 15:55:17
                              No bad, enjoy the conversation and pushing hokie a little - Mo Texan MU - 4/17 16:04:21
                         So you think that anyone who sneaks across the border is - hokie VT - 4/17 15:54:28
                              Not at all, but once in our jurisdiction and controlled by - Mo Texan MU - 4/17 15:58:37
                                   It was argued. It lost. Next case. nm - hokie VT - 4/17 16:02:24
                                        That point was not argued as far as I can tell - Mo Texan MU - 4/17 16:06:52
                                             It had to have been "settled" in a lower court. The - hokie VT - 4/17 16:11:54
                                                  Continue to ignore the point which has nothing to do with - Mo Texan MU - 4/17 17:40:21
               Thanx Ho. They were not denied protection, they were - hokie VT - 4/17 15:41:22
                    See above for merit clarification - Mo Texan MU - 4/17 15:50:36
          Wouldn't you prefer - meatiger MU - 4/17 15:36:54
               Seems to me the case was essentially dismissed for being - hokie VT - 4/17 15:39:30
                    because it sets precedent and a stake in the ground - meatiger MU - 4/17 15:45:12
                    SCOTUS did not grant certiorari. Nm - SparkyStalcup MU - 4/17 15:42:26
                         Right. The court decided that "...the case did not present - hokie VT - 4/17 15:46:59
                              you are correct - FootballRefugee MU - 4/17 16:06:29
     His appointment has no effect on that as only 4 Justices - Mo Texan MU - 4/17 15:31:44
     I'll pray for the women and children. - Toger STL - 4/17 15:24:50
          Why does your conscience need clearing? - Spanky KU - 4/17 15:28:24
               But since Mexico gives them nothing on which to live, - GA Tiger MU - 4/17 15:44:13
                    Even worse.. Mexico will put them in prison if they - Spanky KU - 4/17 15:56:14
          yes, but you won't pay for them either. - RHAYWORTH MU - 4/17 15:28:17
     how is that paying dividends - meatiger MU - 4/17 15:24:02
          It lets a sane decision by a lower court stand - Spanky KU - 4/17 15:29:11
               Maybe like most issues - meatiger MU - 4/17 15:31:28
                    Doubtful... - Spanky KU - 4/17 15:40:35




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard