 |
|
RE: No it doesn't. The wording of the order is what determines
Posted on: February 5, 2017 at 12:38:42 CT
gmmm98 MU
Posts:
13786
Member For:
15.35 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
Examination of purpose is a staple of statutory interpretation for every American appellate court, and governmental purpose is a key element of a good deal of constitutional doctrine. Scrutinizing purpose makes practical sense where an understanding of official objective emerges from readily discoverable fact set forth in a statute’s text, legislative history, and implementation or comparable official act.
Moreover, in an establishment clause analysis the USSC requires the secular purpose be genuine and not a sham.
So. The intent/purpose is not only appropriate to be considered, it MUST be considered.
Moreover, in an establishment clause analysis the USSC requires the secular purpose be genuine and not a sham.
So. The intent/purpose is not only appropriate to be considered, it MUST be considered.
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
RE: No it doesn't. The wording of the order is what determines - gmmm98 MU - 2/5 12:38:42