Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

Over 90% of Muslims aren't even impacted by the EO

Posted on: February 5, 2017 at 12:33:01 CT
Sal CMSU
Posts:
229171
Member For:
21.98 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
so this crazy notion that Trump wants to ban Muslims from the US is absolutely insane. Their logic, according gmmm98, is "Trump said this once, but the EO doesn't state that, therefore the EO isn't legal". What?
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

The appeals court wasn't impressed with tRump's argument - tigerdb MU - 2/5 11:08:01
     It's the 9th circuit aka the most liberal - Sal KC - 2/5 11:50:39
          "their reasoning isn't even legal"...wtf is that supposed to - tigerdb MU - 2/5 12:04:54
          Could save a lot of money by simply - GA Tiger MU - 2/5 11:56:18
     That's why we have higher appeals courts... - Salty Dog MU - 2/5 11:15:42
          that was the 9th circuit - gmmm98 MU - 2/5 11:22:51
               You mean the 9th that always leads in the number of cases - DHighlander KC - 2/5 11:44:55
                    They are trying to assume what - Sal KC - 2/5 11:56:37
                         except it does work that way - gmmm98 MU - 2/5 12:13:42
                              Radical Christians in those countries are killing us. - Coors4bob MU - 2/5 14:40:27
                              I know the 9th circuit feels it's their job to do so - Sal KC - 2/5 12:28:56
                              No it doesn't. The wording of the order is what determines - DHighlander KC - 2/5 12:24:14
                                   RE: No it doesn't. The wording of the order is what determines - gmmm98 MU - 2/5 12:38:42
                                        The intent/purpose - Sal KC - 2/5 12:39:58
                                             RE: The "stated" intent/purpose - tigerdb MU - 2/5 12:45:52
                                                  the stated intent/purpose is stated in the order (nm) - 90Tiger ATL - 2/5 13:28:05
                                                  And again, if he wanted it to be a Muslim ban - Sal KC - 2/5 12:49:59
                                             no one denies that is the stated purpose contained - gmmm98 MU - 2/5 12:43:08
                                   Over 90% of Muslims aren't even impacted by the EO - Sal KC - 2/5 12:33:01
                                        whether this order is effective in banning all muslims - gmmm98 MU - 2/5 12:41:17
                                             The entire argument is he wants to ban Muslims - Sal KC - 2/5 12:49:11
                                                  You don't believe his word - nor Giuliani's? - tigerdb MU - 2/5 12:55:49
                                                       Why these 7? - Sal KC - 2/5 13:05:28
                                                  that's not the argument as to this order at all - gmmm98 MU - 2/5 12:53:32
               Correct...But my assessment of the 9th Circus stands... (nm) - Salty Dog MU - 2/5 11:38:03
     RE: The appeals court wasn't impressed with tRump's argument - MOCO SON MU - 2/5 11:09:10
          So many tears - JayHoaxH8r MU - 2/5 11:11:24
          He never imposed these types of limitations(nm) - tigerdb MU - 2/5 11:11:02
               The Hell he didn't! He imposed a 6 month ban on Iraq in 2011 - Salty Dog MU - 2/5 11:17:30
                    That ban wasn't similar to tRump's ban/noban/extreme vetting - tigerdb MU - 2/5 11:22:44
                         Trump's order is not a "muzz ban" (nm) - Salty Dog MU - 2/5 11:38:46
                              tRump promised a muzz ban; ruby said that tRump told - tigerdb MU - 2/5 12:07:46




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard