The legal term is not the only definition of murder...
Posted on: December 15, 2016 at 11:20:30 CT
JeffB
MU
Posts:
70121
Member For:
20.96 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
Or one could never rightly say that Missouri murdered kansas* again in Saturday's football game, but no one would claim that the author of a newspaper headline like that misunderstood the meaning of "murder".
Is the legal definition of murder to be the exclusive definition to the exclusion of all others? Is it wrong to say that "That physics exam was murder."?
Or more to the point, it would be silly to assert that handicapped people killed in Nazi Germany because of their handicaps were not murdered, because it was not against the law for them to do so.
Nazis were certainly convicted of murder at the Nuremberg trials despite the fact that not only was it legal to deliberately kill those people, but some were even commanded by the government to do so.
In some states in the US it was legal to kill their own slaves. Would it be improper to say that some slaves were murdered in this fashion, even if it was perfectly legal for them to do so at the time?
Edited by JeffB at 11:22:18 on 12/15/16