Welcome Guest

I understand the principle need for fighter planes

Posted on: December 12, 2016 at 14:06:04 CT

MrBlueSky MU

Posts:

48578

Member For:

20.49 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

but what countries could we be getting into conflicts with that even have fighter planes of similar magnitude? Russia? China? Israel? We're not fighting those countries.

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

surely all of us can get behind @realDonaldTrump's latest - blake1771 KC - 12/12 13:18:01

F-35s are not something we need to be producing in - MrBlueSky MU - 12/12 13:19:20

Dumb lib do research then come back. Hint 22 vs 35 (nm) - TigerFan92 MU - 12/13 04:44:53

10 - Rabbit Test MU - 12/12 15:09:07

Bring back the F-4 Phantom. Tried and true. Tested in - Tigrrrr! MU

- 12/12 16:54:01

The F35 is not the prototypical dogfight aircraft - tman KC - 12/12 15:00:34

Hold hands and sing about peace. - Coors4bob MU - 12/12 14:14:47

These types of programs are not for the jobs. (nm) - ummmm MU - 12/12 13:53:13

I guess I just meant war machines in general - MrBlueSky MU - 12/12 14:00:37

"These types of programs are not for the jobs." (nm) - pickle MU

- 12/12 14:25:06

Jesus... (nm) - TigerMatt STL - 12/12 13:30:55

Lol(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 12/12 13:31:55

The F-35 is a 'multi-role aircraft' (ground attack and - Spanky KU - 12/12 13:26:07

they aren't for dogfighting - FootballRefugee MU

- 12/12 13:24:42

We have drones and cruise missiles. Why do we need - MrBlueSky MU - 12/12 13:26:00

another false basis - FootballRefugee MU

- 12/12 13:27:59

You didn't tell me why we need them. - MrBlueSky MU - 12/12 13:36:23

Here you go.... - Spanky KU - 12/12 13:52:01

F-15 and F-18 are decades old platforms. The idea was to - TigerMatt STL - 12/12 13:46:18

Stealth and advanced avionics being key to that transition - Spanky KU - 12/12 13:57:31

Even without the F-35 we'll have air superiority still - MrBlueSky MU - 12/12 13:48:37

As airframes age, the maintenance costs skyrocket. The F-35 - TigerMatt STL - 12/12 13:57:56

He is crazy if he thinks 1978 era aircraft perform better - Spanky KU - 12/12 13:59:17

I wasn't trying to argue that 40 year old aircraft were - MrBlueSky MU - 12/12 14:01:49

Bueno.... - Spanky KU - 12/12 14:11:38

Drones and cruose missiles do not take out aircraft in - TigerMatt STL - 12/12 14:03:31

I understand the principle need for fighter planes - MrBlueSky MU - 12/12 14:06:04

The Syrians are defended by Russian aircraft... - Spanky KU - 12/12 14:23:42

We aren't currently attacking Syria or Iran though - MrBlueSky MU - 12/12 14:58:55

We PLAN for future threats..not react to them. - Spanky KU - 12/12 15:21:43

The DoD wants to stay ahead in technology, not wait for - TigerMatt STL - 12/12 14:18:48

Proxy countries such as Iran will have an air force. - Coors4bob MU - 12/12 14:18:15

And SAM technology improvements need to be counteracted.(nm) - TigerMatt STL - 12/12 14:01:39

This is another good reason, thank you - MrBlueSky MU - 12/12 14:03:16

Recent wars used missiles from ships to soften the "enemy" - TigerMatt STL - 12/12 14:07:18

Close air support is still needed for 'boots on the ground' - Spanky KU - 12/12 14:48:02

On 23 September 2014, F-22s performed the type's first - Spanky KU - 12/12 13:55:28

I guess that's why you aren't in the decision process - Spanky KU - 12/12 13:27:50

I'm no fan of the F35 but it isn't for dogfighting missions(nm) - SuperTone MU

- 12/12 13:23:30

Okay so it's for ground attacks. But still. Why do we need - MrBlueSky MU - 12/12 13:25:05

not correct either. It is supposed to be the swiss army - SuperTone MU

- 12/12 13:27:03

Just for non-interventionist DJT to not use right? (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 12/12 13:33:04

The maturity of this lets me know you can't be very old. - Coors4bob MU - 12/12 14:20:14

is the US "using" its nuclear capabilities? - 90Tiger MU - 12/12 13:59:24

do you carry a gun to use it?(nm) - SuperTone MU

- 12/12 13:35:14