Welcome Guest

Would the 4 hijackers that went through the 'express lane'

Posted on: December 7, 2016 at 14:35:31 CT
Spanky KU
Posts:
142203
Member For:
20.35 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
(or entered the US after Bush was inaugurated)have been denied entry by Clinton or through the 'regular' visa process?

How many hijackers entered through the express Visa?
How many used Student Visas?
How many entered before Jan 2001?

AA Flt 77:
Hani Hasan Hanjour: Obtained student visa (F-1) in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia in Sept. 2000

Khalid al-Mihdhar: arrived in California with fellow hijacker Nawaf al-Hazmi in January 2000

Nawaf al-Hamzi:Arrived at Los Angeles Jan. 15, 2000 with al-Midhar from Malaysia.

Salem al-Hamzi: Obtained U.S. tourist visa in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia in April 1999.

Majed Moqed: Entered on tourist visa obtained in Saudi Arabia after May 2001.

AA Flight 11
Mohamed Atta: Returned to U.S. on January 10, 2001

Satam al-Suqami: applied for and received a two-year B-1/B-2 (tourist/business) visa in Riyadh, on November 21, 2000

Waleed al-Shehri: Obtained tourist visa in Saudi Arabia. Entered U.S. in May 2000.

Wail al-Shehri: obtained United States visas on October 24, 2000

Abdulaziz al-Omari Obtained tourist visa in Saudi Arabia in June 2001

UA Flight 175

Marwan al-Shehhi: In January 2000, obtained 10-year, multiple entry tourist visa in Dubai

Fayez Ahmed Used "Visa Express"

Ahmed al-Ghamdi: He received a U.S. student visa in October 2000.

Hamza Saleh al-Ghamdi: He received a U.S. student visa in October 2000.

Mohand al-Shehri: He received a U.S. student visa in October 2000.

UA Flight 93
Ziad Samir Jarrah: Entered U.S. in June 27, 2000 on a multiple-entry tourist visa in Germany

Saeed al-Ghamd: Received entry through Visa Express.

Ahmed Ibrahim A. al-Haznawi: Visa issued November 2000

Ahmed Abdullah al-Nami: B-1/B-2 tourist/business visas received on October 28, 2000

Edited by Spanky at 16:43:10 on 12/07/16
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

          Why did W attack the pentagon? nm - hokie VT - 12/7 14:45:33
               The answer to that is -what part of the Pentagon did - JG MU - 12/7 14:49:37
                    Ahh, so the answer to my question is a question. Thanx. nm - hokie VT - 12/7 14:52:21
                         You're welcome ...so the answer is???? - JG MU - 12/7 14:57:01
                              I will do some research. I'll have a report on your desk - hokie VT - 12/7 15:12:42
          The government aknowledges unknowingly creating openings - Spanky KU - 12/7 12:52:35
               I had proposed a formal debate on the topic of 911 awhile - JeffB MU - 12/7 13:43:09
                    lol that would be a $hitshow of biblical proportions - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 12/7 14:05:56
                         A 'formal' debate would make it a lot easier to clearly see - JeffB MU - 12/7 15:44:11
                         Your last sentence absolutely nails it - JG MU - 12/7 14:11:31
                              lol it does and congrats - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 12/7 14:15:38
                                   Ragliariny - JG MU - 12/7 14:18:35
                    It would go like this - JG MU - 12/7 14:01:25
                         Would the 4 hijackers that went through the 'express lane' - Spanky KU - 12/7 14:35:31
                              I believe it was that every single one of the terrorists - JG MU - 12/7 14:39:47
                                   Show me that fact.. I gave you the facts - Spanky KU - 12/7 15:02:56
                                        This should be close enough -will look some more if you - JG MU - 12/7 15:05:48
                                             How do ANY of these reflect on Bush or Cheney? - Spanky KU - 12/7 15:15:42
                         The 'Resolution' itself could be negotiated beforehand, of - JeffB MU - 12/7 14:24:06
                              None of the big government supporters will debate - JG MU - 12/7 14:31:08
                                   Hopefully someone will still take up the challenge. Spanky?(nm) - JeffB MU - 12/7 14:42:20
                                        I just smacked him around with his "Express Visa" claim - Spanky KU - 12/7 16:43:15
                                             I think that is exactly the type of claim -> rebuttal... - JeffB MU - 12/7 17:08:13
                                                  I have always questioned George's facts and motives - Spanky KU - 12/7 17:32:23
                                                       So are you in? Willing to do a little bit more of a discipli - JeffB MU - 12/7 17:58:42
                    I don't have a tuxedo - Spanky KU - 12/7 14:00:56
                         How about business casual? I'm not sure shorts & - JeffB MU - 12/7 14:04:45
                              I live in SoCal - Spanky KU - 12/7 14:36:22
                                   OK, casual is fine with me, but you'd have to clear it - JeffB MU - 12/7 15:25:28
               And yet the facts are what they are - JG MU - 12/7 13:09:58
                    You are not well acquainted with facts - Spanky KU - 12/7 13:17:27
                         Yes that is the thing - JG MU - 12/7 13:20:27
                              You are well versed in the speculation of 9-11. Not the - Spanky KU - 12/7 13:22:52
                                   Wrong again. As usual - JG MU - 12/7 13:23:48
                         The fact is alot of people made a ton of cash from 9-11 - Uncle Fester USMC - 12/7 13:19:31
                              yes..that is a fact - Spanky KU - 12/7 13:22:04
                                   Let me axe you something Spank - Uncle Fester USMC - 12/7 13:33:18
                                        I don't think that... no. - Spanky KU - 12/7 13:35:12
                                             Then you are exceedingly naive - JG MU - 12/7 13:36:14
                                                  Please explain how people with that power don't have other - Spanky KU - 12/7 13:51:54
                                                       Its not my theory that they did it strictly for money - JG MU - 12/7 14:04:15
                                                            9-11 was not needed for a war with Iraq - Spanky KU - 12/7 16:44:43
                                   Nothing but evidence - JG MU - 12/7 13:26:32
                                        Not all evidence is factual George. You know that. - Spanky KU - 12/7 14:02:11
                                             LOL yes it is - JG MU - 12/7 14:04:54
               Well...lets just hope Fido is not a republican.(nm) - GA Tiger MU - 12/7 13:02:58
          lol Van Jones, another strong ally for your JG(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 12/7 12:49:05
               LOL the fact that you believe that lends credence to - JG MU - 12/7 13:08:56
                    lol - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 12/7 13:13:10
                         We should chip in to buy this for JG. - TigerMatt MU - 12/7 13:37:09
                              who's gonna read it to him lol(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 12/7 13:38:32
                         Yes! - JG MU - 12/7 13:14:57
                              lol no wonder you lash out so much - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 12/7 13:22:15
                                   Those of us who understand English - JG MU - 12/7 13:24:40
               Ed Asner, Woody Harrelson, and Charlie Sheen - Ferg STL - 12/7 13:05:07
               Bernie, Jill, Van "social justice accelerator" Jones and the - TigerMatt MU - 12/7 12:52:19
                    lol the dream team(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 12/7 13:00:33
                         "Van Jones now believes what I believe - JG MU - 12/7 13:16:10
          Proof of your assertion?(nm) - TigerMatt MU - 12/7 12:47:22




©2024 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard