Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

I've asked thousands much tougher - at least for

Posted on: December 6, 2016 at 13:35:55 CT
GA Tiger MU
Posts:
252553
Member For:
26.43 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
the intended recipients.

Within the intent of definition and intent, yes, it is law.

Next question.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

The toughest question you'll ever be asked: - pickle MU - 12/6 12:30:25
     I've asked thousands much tougher - at least for - GA Tiger MU - 12/6 13:35:55
          Well here's a tough one for you - pickle MU - 12/6 13:43:37
               I can do that, while conversing with you.(nm) - GA Tiger MU - 12/6 13:44:39
                    RE: I can do that, while conversing with you.(nm) - pickle MU - 12/6 13:50:41
     RE: The toughest question you'll ever be asked: - FootballRefugee MU - 12/6 13:24:00
     I thought it would be: do you admire pickle's smart posting? - RHAYWORTH MU - 12/6 12:54:48
     No(nm) - meatiger MU - 12/6 12:36:27
     RE: The toughest question you'll ever be asked: - Tigrrrr! MU - 12/6 12:36:17
     it's a framework(nm) - dangertim MU - 12/6 12:35:49
          It very clearly states that it is "law" within the document - ummmm MU - 12/6 12:38:29
               Can you name someone that was charged - meatiger MU - 12/6 13:15:19
                    There is more to laws than criminality. (nm) - ummmm MU - 12/6 13:28:17
                    why would you ask that question? - 90Tiger MU - 12/6 13:23:19
                         my poiint being - meatiger MU - 12/6 13:25:41
                              your point is that spanky took a simple question and - 90Tiger MU - 12/6 14:06:57
                              RE: my poiint being - ummmm MU - 12/6 13:29:44
                              Most codified laws are not criminal laws, though (nm) - ummmm MU - 12/6 13:28:52
                    The Constitution applies to the federal gvmt - pickle MU - 12/6 13:23:11
               yes. removing the phrases: - 90Tiger MU - 12/6 12:46:16
                    "I can't fathom why..." Of course you can - pickle MU - 12/6 12:52:41
                         That statement about folks having difficulty with your - 90Tiger MU - 12/6 12:57:44
                              Ohhhhh... - pickle MU - 12/6 12:59:26
                                   No, just as I said in this thread. Go ahead and disagree - 90Tiger MU - 12/6 13:09:19
                                        I'm referring to the thread with MU98 - pickle MU - 12/6 13:11:32
                                             So I was right twice? Here's a third "snit" - there are few - 90Tiger MU - 12/6 13:14:38
                    My answer - Spanky KU - 12/6 12:47:24
                         Well, you added the qualifier "codified" which is strange - ummmm MU - 12/6 12:51:34
                              Precision is key in dealing with pickle's dumb questions - Spanky KU - 12/6 12:57:47
                                   You said "Trump HAS TO enforce federal law" - pickle MU - 12/6 13:01:18
                                        What I actually said: - Spanky KU - 12/6 13:04:55
                                             That's what I just said. "Trump HAS TO enforce federal law." - pickle MU - 12/6 13:08:19
                                                  No.. You truncated what I said. - Spanky KU - 12/6 13:14:55
                                                       Well either he HAS TO enforce federal law or not - pickle MU - 12/6 13:27:51
                                                            Read the ENTIRE post, dipstick! - Spanky KU - 12/6 13:32:37
                                                                 I have. Try reading the post you responded to - pickle MU - 12/6 13:40:03
                                                                      You have trouble reading... - Spanky KU - 12/6 13:51:11
                                                                           It is clear you won't answer questions (nm) - pickle MU - 12/6 13:53:00
                                                                                No.. it is clear you cannot comprehend complex thoughts - Spanky KU - 12/6 13:56:29
                                   no, you're being stubborn and intentionally obtuse here (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 12/6 12:58:51
                         your answer is simply wrong. It is federal law, period. (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 12/6 12:48:01
                              Perhaps. - Spanky KU - 12/6 12:49:06
                                   Well, you're guilty of it here, to be sure. (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 12/6 12:59:12
                                        I disagree. I gave him a VERY precise answer - Spanky KU - 12/6 13:02:27
                                             you gave him an incorrect answer because you chose - 90Tiger MU - 12/6 13:16:01
                                                  He asked a question that is nuanced. - Spanky KU - 12/6 13:17:55
                                                       you continue to double down on your mistake. It is, - 90Tiger MU - 12/6 13:24:05
                                                            Federal law consists of acts of Congress, treaties - Spanky KU - 12/6 13:26:51
                                                                 the us constitution is federal law. he didn't ask if it was - 90Tiger MU - 12/6 14:09:43
                                                                      We disagree. My answer was precise..his question was not. - Spanky KU - 12/6 15:45:10
     Yes (nm) - ummmm MU - 12/6 12:34:26
          Was that hard? - pickle MU - 12/6 12:36:16
               What does this refer to? (nm) - ummmm MU - 12/6 12:40:08
                    Take one guess - pickle MU - 12/6 12:41:12
               It was a pretty simple task (nm) - ummmm MU - 12/6 12:39:04
                    Damn - pickle MU - 12/6 12:40:42
     STFU(nm) - Tigrrrr! MU - 12/6 12:34:21
     No. - RayKinsella1922 SEC - 12/6 12:33:54
          Pretty easy to answer yes or no, wasn't it? (nm) - pickle MU - 12/6 12:37:20
               Do you see how you got 'yes' and 'no' answers? - Spanky KU - 12/6 12:45:33
                    Yes, I see how I got yes or no answers - pickle MU - 12/6 12:54:26
                         And both answers were correct... That's why I gave - Spanky KU - 12/6 12:58:48
                              You never gave a yes or a no - pickle MU - 12/6 13:02:00
                                   Here - Spanky KU - 12/6 13:15:57
                    "typically", but not in this case, and the answer is stil - 90Tiger MU - 12/6 12:47:25
                         Because pickle asks ambiguous questions - Spanky KU - 12/6 12:48:06
                              yes - FootballRefugee MU - 12/6 13:22:23
                                   The question was about the Constitution - pickle MU - 12/6 13:29:24
                                        The Constitution is ABOUT OTHER LAWS. Jesus.(nm) - GA Tiger MU - 12/6 13:44:00
                                             What? - pickle MU - 12/6 13:51:44
                                   This constitution (and the laws which shall be made pursuant - 90Tiger MU - 12/6 13:25:39
                              his question is unambiguous (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 12/6 12:59:47
                                   We disagree - Spanky KU - 12/6 13:02:18




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard