Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

Can you name someone that was charged

Posted on: December 6, 2016 at 13:15:19 CT
meatiger MU
Posts:
133049
Member For:
26.43 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
and convicted from a direct Constitutional law?

Since the Constitution does not define punishments, how is that done.

It is because actual laws are made that specifically describe the law as well as punishment from breaking such law.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

The toughest question you'll ever be asked: - pickle MU - 12/6 12:30:25
     I've asked thousands much tougher - at least for - GA Tiger MU - 12/6 13:35:55
          Well here's a tough one for you - pickle MU - 12/6 13:43:37
               I can do that, while conversing with you.(nm) - GA Tiger MU - 12/6 13:44:39
                    RE: I can do that, while conversing with you.(nm) - pickle MU - 12/6 13:50:41
     RE: The toughest question you'll ever be asked: - FootballRefugee MU - 12/6 13:24:00
     I thought it would be: do you admire pickle's smart posting? - RHAYWORTH MU - 12/6 12:54:48
     No(nm) - meatiger MU - 12/6 12:36:27
     RE: The toughest question you'll ever be asked: - Tigrrrr! MU - 12/6 12:36:17
     it's a framework(nm) - dangertim MU - 12/6 12:35:49
          It very clearly states that it is "law" within the document - ummmm MU - 12/6 12:38:29
               Can you name someone that was charged - meatiger MU - 12/6 13:15:19
                    There is more to laws than criminality. (nm) - ummmm MU - 12/6 13:28:17
                    why would you ask that question? - 90Tiger MU - 12/6 13:23:19
                         my poiint being - meatiger MU - 12/6 13:25:41
                              your point is that spanky took a simple question and - 90Tiger MU - 12/6 14:06:57
                              RE: my poiint being - ummmm MU - 12/6 13:29:44
                              Most codified laws are not criminal laws, though (nm) - ummmm MU - 12/6 13:28:52
                    The Constitution applies to the federal gvmt - pickle MU - 12/6 13:23:11
               yes. removing the phrases: - 90Tiger MU - 12/6 12:46:16
                    "I can't fathom why..." Of course you can - pickle MU - 12/6 12:52:41
                         That statement about folks having difficulty with your - 90Tiger MU - 12/6 12:57:44
                              Ohhhhh... - pickle MU - 12/6 12:59:26
                                   No, just as I said in this thread. Go ahead and disagree - 90Tiger MU - 12/6 13:09:19
                                        I'm referring to the thread with MU98 - pickle MU - 12/6 13:11:32
                                             So I was right twice? Here's a third "snit" - there are few - 90Tiger MU - 12/6 13:14:38
                    My answer - Spanky KU - 12/6 12:47:24
                         Well, you added the qualifier "codified" which is strange - ummmm MU - 12/6 12:51:34
                              Precision is key in dealing with pickle's dumb questions - Spanky KU - 12/6 12:57:47
                                   You said "Trump HAS TO enforce federal law" - pickle MU - 12/6 13:01:18
                                        What I actually said: - Spanky KU - 12/6 13:04:55
                                             That's what I just said. "Trump HAS TO enforce federal law." - pickle MU - 12/6 13:08:19
                                                  No.. You truncated what I said. - Spanky KU - 12/6 13:14:55
                                                       Well either he HAS TO enforce federal law or not - pickle MU - 12/6 13:27:51
                                                            Read the ENTIRE post, dipstick! - Spanky KU - 12/6 13:32:37
                                                                 I have. Try reading the post you responded to - pickle MU - 12/6 13:40:03
                                                                      You have trouble reading... - Spanky KU - 12/6 13:51:11
                                                                           It is clear you won't answer questions (nm) - pickle MU - 12/6 13:53:00
                                                                                No.. it is clear you cannot comprehend complex thoughts - Spanky KU - 12/6 13:56:29
                                   no, you're being stubborn and intentionally obtuse here (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 12/6 12:58:51
                         your answer is simply wrong. It is federal law, period. (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 12/6 12:48:01
                              Perhaps. - Spanky KU - 12/6 12:49:06
                                   Well, you're guilty of it here, to be sure. (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 12/6 12:59:12
                                        I disagree. I gave him a VERY precise answer - Spanky KU - 12/6 13:02:27
                                             you gave him an incorrect answer because you chose - 90Tiger MU - 12/6 13:16:01
                                                  He asked a question that is nuanced. - Spanky KU - 12/6 13:17:55
                                                       you continue to double down on your mistake. It is, - 90Tiger MU - 12/6 13:24:05
                                                            Federal law consists of acts of Congress, treaties - Spanky KU - 12/6 13:26:51
                                                                 the us constitution is federal law. he didn't ask if it was - 90Tiger MU - 12/6 14:09:43
                                                                      We disagree. My answer was precise..his question was not. - Spanky KU - 12/6 15:45:10
     Yes (nm) - ummmm MU - 12/6 12:34:26
          Was that hard? - pickle MU - 12/6 12:36:16
               What does this refer to? (nm) - ummmm MU - 12/6 12:40:08
                    Take one guess - pickle MU - 12/6 12:41:12
               It was a pretty simple task (nm) - ummmm MU - 12/6 12:39:04
                    Damn - pickle MU - 12/6 12:40:42
     STFU(nm) - Tigrrrr! MU - 12/6 12:34:21
     No. - RayKinsella1922 SEC - 12/6 12:33:54
          Pretty easy to answer yes or no, wasn't it? (nm) - pickle MU - 12/6 12:37:20
               Do you see how you got 'yes' and 'no' answers? - Spanky KU - 12/6 12:45:33
                    Yes, I see how I got yes or no answers - pickle MU - 12/6 12:54:26
                         And both answers were correct... That's why I gave - Spanky KU - 12/6 12:58:48
                              You never gave a yes or a no - pickle MU - 12/6 13:02:00
                                   Here - Spanky KU - 12/6 13:15:57
                    "typically", but not in this case, and the answer is stil - 90Tiger MU - 12/6 12:47:25
                         Because pickle asks ambiguous questions - Spanky KU - 12/6 12:48:06
                              yes - FootballRefugee MU - 12/6 13:22:23
                                   The question was about the Constitution - pickle MU - 12/6 13:29:24
                                        The Constitution is ABOUT OTHER LAWS. Jesus.(nm) - GA Tiger MU - 12/6 13:44:00
                                             What? - pickle MU - 12/6 13:51:44
                                   This constitution (and the laws which shall be made pursuant - 90Tiger MU - 12/6 13:25:39
                              his question is unambiguous (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 12/6 12:59:47
                                   We disagree - Spanky KU - 12/6 13:02:18




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard