Welcome Guest

Um, no.

Posted on: August 31, 2016 at 08:56:13 CT

Evenflow MU

Posts:

68471

Member For:

19.03 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

It's for medical, and intended to sucker the public. So, if a doctor screws up one of your kids real bad, he gets 250 for past and future medical, pain, suffering, etc.

Edited by Evenflow at 09:26:13 on 08/31/16

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

I'm all for Tort Reform but $250,000 seems low - tigerinhogtown STL - 8/31 08:50:48

The idea of a lawsuit is to recover lost money. - Spanky KU - 8/31 09:28:15

That's part of it. - DC Jayhawk KU - 8/31 09:42:48

That's a theory.. a malpractice loss should be incentive - Spanky KU - 8/31 09:48:10

It's not a theory - DC Jayhawk KU - 8/31 09:54:17

your insistence doesn't make your statements true - FootballRefugee MU

- 8/31 11:41:34

Good lord. - DC Jayhawk KU - 8/31 13:25:49

but those punitive damages force Dr to practice - tigerinhogtown STL - 8/31 10:03:53

to clarify, not sure it's punitive damages that cause that - tigerinhogtown STL - 8/31 10:05:00

It is a theory..... - Spanky KU - 8/31 10:03:24

Medical lawsuits are bizarre - Roberts MU - 8/31 09:27:47

Sort of like when someone runs a stop sign - Evenflow MU - 8/31 09:36:02

mostly agree - meatiger MU - 8/31 09:29:54

One part of such reform should be not only - GA Tiger MU - 8/31 09:22:24

So...you favor corp lawyers(nm) - meatiger MU - 8/31 09:26:10

Agreed and good luck affording counsel that can compete - MKrip MU - 8/31 09:13:54

Um, no. - Evenflow MU - 8/31 08:56:13