Self contradictions are inherently irrational. One example:
Posted on: August 30, 2016 at 12:30:59 CT
JeffB
MU
Posts:
72195
Member For:
21.42 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
The core of his moral foundation is the non-aggression principle, or NAP, which says:
"Aggression" is inherently illegitimate. "Aggression" is defined as the "initiation" of physical force against persons or property, the threat of such, or fraud upon persons or their property.
and yet he favors the 'right' of a mother to kill or to have someone else deliberately kill her innocent unborn child or children.
Twisting the arms and legs off of innocent human beings is about as "twisted" as it gets... and it happens thousands of times a day in the U.S. alone... and pickle believes that they have a legal right to do so.
"I understand that many people, on this Board, imagine poor results."
I believe implementation of his ideas would lead to catastrophic results, and advocating for a change to a societal structure that would lead to catastrophic results is irrational in my book.