Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

I disagree. I don't believe they were vetted sufficiently

Posted on: September 2, 2025 at 09:39:25 CT
90Tiger STL
Posts:
166297
Member For:
23.53 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
to meet the criteria to receive the status to be assigned a full hearing.

Non-enforcement of the criteria already shared. Do you not agree asylees are, by law, supposed to meet these criteria before admittance (and assigned a full hearing)? You think they just get in without vetting until their hearing (which biden removed the "within 1 year" requirement btw)?

Who can apply for asylum?
You must be physically present in the United States or at a port of entry.
You must meet the definition of a refugee, meaning you have been persecuted or have a well-founded fear of future persecution in your home country.

This persecution must be based on one of the following grounds:
Race
Religion
Nationality
Membership in a particular social group
Political opinion
You must not be subject to any mandatory bars to asylum eligibility.

the biden admin checked none of this
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Deport all illegals! - MUTGR MU - 9/1 22:56:54
     Deport all illegals!: There are 55 million foreigners who - BH O'bonga MU - 9/2 07:28:41
     You all are pretty loosey goosey on defining who that is and - raskolnikov MU - 9/2 06:09:42
          It's pretty cut and dry (nm) - Bosalphus KC - 9/2 07:47:35
          Because the Biden admin solicited, paid for, and got their - 90Tiger STL - 9/2 07:28:16
               Potential asylees are not illegal. (nm) - haeffb MU - 9/2 08:18:33
                    And here is specifically the requirement not met: - 90Tiger STL - 9/2 08:37:45
                    They are when the US admin brings them in with zero - 90Tiger STL - 9/2 08:35:24
                         The potential asylees did nothing wrong. - haeffb MU - 9/2 09:07:44
                              I didn't say the potential asylees "did something wrong" - 90Tiger STL - 9/2 09:26:31
                                   They are here legally - haeffb MU - 9/2 09:35:25
                                        I disagree. I don't believe they were vetted sufficiently - 90Tiger STL - 9/2 09:39:25
                                             What crime? (nm) - haeffb MU - 9/2 09:58:46
                                                  RE: What crime? (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 9/2 11:15:31
                                                       The law requires vetting - haeffb MU - 9/2 13:11:39
                                                       Here’s the law. - haeffb MU - 9/2 13:01:51
                              Unless they followed the law, they are in fact illegal. - hangman MU - 9/2 09:26:25
                                   They did follow the law. - haeffb MU - 9/2 09:36:06
                                        RE: They did follow the law. - 90Tiger STL - 9/2 09:44:02
                                        no, they didn't - 90Tiger STL - 9/2 09:41:04
          Lol, rask....... (nm) - MIZ45 KC - 9/2 07:24:04
          No, it's pretty cut and dry. If you are not a citizen but - DHighlander NWMSU - 9/2 07:18:47
          You seem to struggle with the simplest concept. Can you - hangman MU - 9/2 06:31:56
          You are lying - GODZILLA MU - 9/2 06:27:57
          Illegal = didn't come here through the lawful process...nm - tigertix MU - 9/2 06:19:27
     How many of the 44% that don't favor it are illegals...nm - tigertix MU - 9/2 05:51:59
     Yep - Spanky KU - 9/1 23:23:23




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard