Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

You may be correct if peer review were an academic process.

Posted on: January 31, 2025 at 08:44:19 CT
DHighlander NWMSU
Posts:
50797
Member For:
16.74 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
It's not.

I'm not even sure you can call it a political process anymore. It has morphed into a type of inquisition whose purpose is to excommunicate the heretics.

The heart of science is to question the consensus. Science does not advance by consensus, it advances by those with the guts to question conformity.

Einstein's theories of relativity were soundly rejected by his peers.

Edited by DHighlander at 08:47:22 on 01/31/25
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

These people are absolutely nuts ... - Fourth and Long MU - 1/31 07:03:28
     RE: These people are absolutely nuts: Obvious on its face - BH O'bonga MU - 1/31 08:12:36
     Moe is one person, singular (nm) - FIJItiger MU - 1/31 07:36:49
          lol (nm) - Bosalphus KC - 1/31 07:53:42
     Why is TJ Moe sharing a 2019 article headline now - KCT-BoneTiger MU - 1/31 07:27:29
          Is sum ting wong rith that?(nm) - Panthera MU - 1/31 07:56:03
          The article is just as stupid now, as it was 2019. - RHAYWORTH MU - 1/31 07:55:58
               Doesn’t mean it is wrong.(nm) - TigerMatt KC - 1/31 07:57:56
                    Do you think TJ Moe read who funded the research before - KCT-BoneTiger MU - 1/31 08:01:42
               Did you read the actual study, not the piece commenting on - KCT-BoneTiger MU - 1/31 07:57:52
                    Do you think TJ Moe read the study? (nm) - KCT-BoneTiger MU - 1/31 08:03:35
                         Why are you talking to yourself dummy(nm) - Panthera MU - 1/31 10:11:52
     Is there ANYTHING that does not eventually come down - hokie VT - 1/31 07:07:21
          Do wonder how TJ Moe came across a peer reviewed journal - KCT-BoneTiger MU - 1/31 07:33:31
               leftard journalism isn't journalism. Just propaganda(nm) - TigerFan92 STL - 1/31 08:20:06
               You seem to believe that Peer Review somehow equates - DHighlander NWMSU - 1/31 07:53:11
                    lol. Wow(nm) - meatiger MU - 1/31 08:07:58
                         Here to Meat up a new thread are you?(nm) - DHighlander NWMSU - 1/31 08:12:54
                              RE: Here to Meat up a new thread are you?(nm) - meatiger MU - 1/31 08:23:37
                                   You may be correct if peer review were an academic process. - DHighlander NWMSU - 1/31 08:44:19
                                        RE: You may be correct if peer review were an academic process. - meatiger MU - 1/31 09:13:35
                    the article was reviewed by JG, Fiji, Ras, and Sparkystalcup - RHAYWORTH MU - 1/31 07:57:56
                         That’s an incredible super power to read the minds of people - TigerMatt KC - 1/31 07:59:17
                              Given the group(progressive left) involved, it's easy. - RHAYWORTH MU - 1/31 08:20:22
                    Except the research is published which allows for comment - TigerMatt KC - 1/31 07:56:23
                         What does that have to do with peer review?(nm) - DHighlander NWMSU - 1/31 08:07:23
                         Lol. Are you serious? What sane person would disagree? - RHAYWORTH MU - 1/31 08:06:17
                    I acknowledge there are issues with the peer reviewed - KCT-BoneTiger MU - 1/31 07:55:49




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard