Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

You seem to believe that Peer Review somehow equates

Posted on: January 31, 2025 at 07:53:11 CT
DHighlander NWMSU
Posts:
50797
Member For:
16.74 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
to infallible. If all of your peers are being funded from the same trough, they are likely to come to similar conclusions to ensure that the funding dollars continue to flow.

I can get a consensus from a group of eight-year-olds on what's the best food but I will not be getting all of my meals from McDonalds.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

These people are absolutely nuts ... - Fourth and Long MU - 1/31 07:03:28
     RE: These people are absolutely nuts: Obvious on its face - BH O'bonga MU - 1/31 08:12:36
     Moe is one person, singular (nm) - FIJItiger MU - 1/31 07:36:49
          lol (nm) - Bosalphus KC - 1/31 07:53:42
     Why is TJ Moe sharing a 2019 article headline now - KCT-BoneTiger MU - 1/31 07:27:29
          Is sum ting wong rith that?(nm) - Panthera MU - 1/31 07:56:03
          The article is just as stupid now, as it was 2019. - RHAYWORTH MU - 1/31 07:55:58
               Doesn’t mean it is wrong.(nm) - TigerMatt KC - 1/31 07:57:56
                    Do you think TJ Moe read who funded the research before - KCT-BoneTiger MU - 1/31 08:01:42
               Did you read the actual study, not the piece commenting on - KCT-BoneTiger MU - 1/31 07:57:52
                    Do you think TJ Moe read the study? (nm) - KCT-BoneTiger MU - 1/31 08:03:35
                         Why are you talking to yourself dummy(nm) - Panthera MU - 1/31 10:11:52
     Is there ANYTHING that does not eventually come down - hokie VT - 1/31 07:07:21
          Do wonder how TJ Moe came across a peer reviewed journal - KCT-BoneTiger MU - 1/31 07:33:31
               leftard journalism isn't journalism. Just propaganda(nm) - TigerFan92 STL - 1/31 08:20:06
               You seem to believe that Peer Review somehow equates - DHighlander NWMSU - 1/31 07:53:11
                    lol. Wow(nm) - meatiger MU - 1/31 08:07:58
                         Here to Meat up a new thread are you?(nm) - DHighlander NWMSU - 1/31 08:12:54
                              RE: Here to Meat up a new thread are you?(nm) - meatiger MU - 1/31 08:23:37
                                   You may be correct if peer review were an academic process. - DHighlander NWMSU - 1/31 08:44:19
                                        RE: You may be correct if peer review were an academic process. - meatiger MU - 1/31 09:13:35
                    the article was reviewed by JG, Fiji, Ras, and Sparkystalcup - RHAYWORTH MU - 1/31 07:57:56
                         That’s an incredible super power to read the minds of people - TigerMatt KC - 1/31 07:59:17
                              Given the group(progressive left) involved, it's easy. - RHAYWORTH MU - 1/31 08:20:22
                    Except the research is published which allows for comment - TigerMatt KC - 1/31 07:56:23
                         What does that have to do with peer review?(nm) - DHighlander NWMSU - 1/31 08:07:23
                         Lol. Are you serious? What sane person would disagree? - RHAYWORTH MU - 1/31 08:06:17
                    I acknowledge there are issues with the peer reviewed - KCT-BoneTiger MU - 1/31 07:55:49




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard