 |
|
That would cause even more opt outs IMO
Posted on: December 18, 2024 at 13:02:15 CT
Eggs MU
Posts:
154044
Member For:
26.44 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
Winning would have no historical significance and it would take a bunch of logistics and extra games to pull off. Guys aren't going to want to play 3-4 extra games just to be the NIT of football champions.
I wouldn't be surprised to see some degree of bowl games dying in the next 10 years. I don't really see how it's sustainable financially. It's basically another non con game where lots of key players choose not to play.
Want more teams with something to play for? Expand the playoff to 32 teams, eliminate conference title games, and knock a week off the regular season. Then at the most teams are playing 16 games and the majority will only play 11-12.
I wouldn't be surprised to see some degree of bowl games dying in the next 10 years. I don't really see how it's sustainable financially. It's basically another non con game where lots of key players choose not to play.
Want more teams with something to play for? Expand the playoff to 32 teams, eliminate conference title games, and knock a week off the regular season. Then at the most teams are playing 16 games and the majority will only play 11-12.
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
Rossi has jerked off to this post at least twice by now(nm) - Fire Marshall Bill MU - 12/18 13:06:39That would cause even more opt outs IMO - Eggs MU - 12/18 13:02:15