Welcome Guest

Ah, there it is! The red herring! This isn't 2017-2020, me

Posted on: November 9, 2024 at 13:07:26 CT
90Tiger STL
Posts:
155112
Member For:
22.73 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
10
at, this discussion is about what Trump will or won't do from 2025-2029.

I can't even see much of 2016 Trump in this Trump; 2016 Trump would have never released his "eliminate the deep state" agenda 2 days after winning the election. Hell, he had no team, was surrounded by people with different agendas and was fighting everyone inside and out.

If you want to think Trump today is the same Trump as then, you're entitled. I think he has astonishingly better leadership and organization around him (see his campaign) and a crisp, clear agenda and now the understanding of how to execute.

Again, you can view his intent however you wish. I don't think it has changed philosophically. I think he's wiser and surrounded by a massively better team and has a very real chance to impact change.

one example: I don't think he'll chase butterflies in his first 2 years (like trying to revoke the ACA the first time). I think you'll see EO's and legislation on day 1 and this will be a whirlwind, for good or bad, however you see it.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

     Just think of the cell phones, computer files and documents - BH O'bonga MU - 11/9 12:46:50
     for meat: there is no difference, they are all the same - 90Tiger STL - 11/9 12:39:39
          Biden's rule doesn't shield them from prosecution for - tigertix MU - 11/9 12:44:06
          RE: for meat: there is no difference, they are all the same - meatiger MU - 11/9 12:42:29
               Ok, what about the dems lawfare against Trump, what the hell - tigertix MU - 11/9 12:45:27
                    It is horrible - meatiger MU - 11/9 12:47:32
                         whether they should or shouldn't be on the books wasn't - 90Tiger STL - 11/9 12:49:00
                              RE: whether they should or shouldn't be on the books wasn't - meatiger MU - 11/9 12:50:47
                                   it isn't relevant. The issue was lawfare, not the legitimac - 90Tiger STL - 11/9 12:51:48
               who said "replace them with others" other than you as - 90Tiger STL - 11/9 12:43:50
                    RE: who said "replace them with others" other than you as - meatiger MU - 11/9 12:46:19
                         re-read this: - 90Tiger STL - 11/9 12:50:04
                              RE: re-read this: - meatiger MU - 11/9 12:53:08
                                   Ah, there it is! The red herring! This isn't 2017-2020, me - 90Tiger STL - 11/9 13:07:26
                                        RE: Ah, there it is! The red herring! This isn't 2017-2020, me - meatiger MU - 11/9 13:18:32
                                             meat, nobody expects him to dissemble the gvmt. he - 90Tiger STL - 11/9 13:20:30
                                                  RE: meat, nobody expects him to dissemble the gvmt. he - meatiger MU - 11/9 13:52:28
                                                       you're an idiot, meat (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 11/9 14:17:08
                                                            RE: you're an idiot, meat (nm) - meatiger MU - 11/9 16:46:26




©2024 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard