Welcome Guest

based on that logic, the SEC should get more AQ bids than

Posted on: October 2, 2024 at 15:44:56 CT
zounami MU
Posts:
66538
Member For:
10.45 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
the B1G, since the (current 16) SEC members have reached the 4-team playoff at a *significantly higher rate* than the (current 18) B1G members.

In reality, the SEC is going to get 4 teams in regardless, via at-large bids. It doesn't need an AQ guarantee.

The B1G, on the other hand, would certainly benefit from 4 guaranteed bids... and most likely, would steal a bid from a more-deserving SEC team.

As I said before, the SEC would be *fools* to agree to this – as would the ACC and XII.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

     yes, they are creating a monopoly perhaps oligarchy ... - tmcats KSU - 10/2 19:16:31
          No less so than dividing Division 1 up between FBS and FCS. - TigerMatt MISS - 10/2 21:16:53
          LOL - I can't tell if this is serious or not.(nm) - Carlos Rossi KC - 10/2 20:40:25
          So much for your (alleged) conservative Republican - JeffB MU - 10/2 20:04:23
     They knew this when they formed the bigger leagues - Genco98 MU - 10/2 17:31:07
     Can't play a 9 game SEC schedule if it will hurt the - TigerFan92 STL - 10/2 15:51:19
          The B1G would *love* that. It would effectively cap the SEC - zounami MU - 10/2 16:19:46
               ... here's what I would offer the Big Ten: - zounami MU - 10/2 16:24:12
               SEC is currently an 8 game schedule(nm) - TigerFan92 STL - 10/2 16:23:47
                    correct, that's the "current format" I referred to (nm) - zounami MU - 10/2 16:24:53
     based on that logic, the SEC should get more AQ bids than - zounami MU - 10/2 15:44:56




©2024 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard