Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

You don't understand. If Scotus corrects or rescinds

Posted on: July 17, 2024 at 08:57:34 CT
hokie VT
Posts:
64266
Member For:
8.92 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
a Decision made decades earlier by an activist liberal court, it is not the activist liberal court who is activist.

It is the current Supreme Court that is making up the laws by properly, interpreting the constitution of the United States.

And until legislators, stop pontificating and pass a law on abortion, abortion decisions belong in the states and to the states.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

If Sc justices had term limits our laws would change every - ZouMiz STL - 7/17 07:37:20
     Only in a world where judges make law rather than interpret - raskolnikov MU - 7/17 08:30:11
          Who is the activist judge on SCOTUS? - Spanky KU - 7/17 10:27:47
          RvW restored constitutionality. The ACA is not a "tax" and i - 90Tiger STL - 7/17 09:06:44
               The chief justice of the United States "suggested" to bronco - hokie VT - 7/17 09:17:32
          Roe literally made up a Constitutional right(nm) - Th8tnTiger MU - 7/17 08:49:20
               You don't understand. If Scotus corrects or rescinds - hokie VT - 7/17 08:57:34
               lol he's f-ing clueless (nm) - Sal CMSU - 7/17 08:50:14
                    Ras is a loyal progressive serf - RHAYWORTH MU - 7/17 08:55:58
          RE: Only in a world where judges make law rather than interpret - Frank Poncherello MU - 7/17 08:33:44
          what specific laws are you referring to? (nm) - Sal CMSU - 7/17 08:31:51
               Presidential immunity . Overturning Chevron, Dobbs - raskolnikov MU - 7/17 08:41:17
                    you may want to do some research here, rask (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 7/17 09:07:19
                         Where is Presidential immunity - haeffb MU - 7/17 10:09:53
                              sidebar: What law did SCOTUS create? (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 7/17 10:43:26
                              I assume you still haven't read the decision or a summary? - 90Tiger STL - 7/17 10:43:06
                                   I’ve read the decision. - haeffb MU - 7/17 11:27:08
                    Dems will fail from running a senile retard - RHAYWORTH MU - 7/17 08:58:31
                    go back and re-read your post - Sal CMSU - 7/17 08:43:28
                    Goddam that's stupid - Wildcat KSU - 7/17 08:42:18
     instead of every 40ish? (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 7/17 07:55:15
     It would be a cascade of catastrophe yes(nm) - AWOLTiger KC - 7/17 07:52:28
     Expiring laws - meatiger MU - 7/17 07:52:10
          Only tax cuts expire - El-ahrairah BAMA - 7/17 07:53:52
               Lol(nm) - meatiger MU - 7/17 07:58:01
     The left is losing, they want to change the rules. It's like - hokie VT - 7/17 07:40:01
          That is exactly what executive orders are(nm) - meatiger MU - 7/17 07:52:51
               Of course they are princess. Run along now. Nm - hokie VT - 7/17 07:55:15
                    Are EOs not changing the rules?(nm) - meatiger MU - 7/17 08:04:57
                         in practice yes. in theory no. (nm) - tman MU - 7/17 08:28:08
                         Upon further review. You have a point. My Apologies. N M - hokie VT - 7/17 08:24:34
     congress is welcomed to introduce amendments - Sal CMSU - 7/17 07:39:21




©2024 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard