Welcome Guest

Iiuc, it's only a ban if tick-tock does not sell it to

Posted on: March 18, 2024 at 13:28:24 CT
hokie VT
Posts:
63996
Member For:
8.87 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
American individuals.

I went back-and-forth on this one, but came down on the side that we would not allow the New York Times, or the Washington post to be owned by Communist China. Not that it would look much different… But TikTok is controlled by the communist government and should not be allowed to spread its propaganda, especially to our youth.



Someone once said that the constitution is not a suicide pact. And I see no reason to give our enemies full and free access to submit, lies and propaganda and anti-American rubbish targeted specifically at our children.

And when I heard a representative of TikTok, address the media, and say that TikTok creates so many jobs, and so much wealth, and is so wonderful, and so good for the youth of America, that Congress should be besieged with requests to keep it. For the good of the country.

That's like when asstray and the idiot quote the first amendment of the constitution and talk about saving democracy.

Someone much smarter than they want said that the constitution is not a suicide pact and I feel no obligation to allow sworn enemies of our country, easier access to our youth , in order to assist them and their effort to destroy the United States.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

     What are your thoughts on the TikTok ban? (nm) - ummmm MU - 3/18 13:19:34
          Iiuc, it's only a ban if tick-tock does not sell it to - hokie VT - 3/18 13:28:24
               Okay, so you are in favor of govt censoring speech and if - ummmm MU - 3/18 13:33:54
                    but it doesn't... the 1st amendment does not preclude a - zounami MU - 3/18 13:46:59
                         Yes, it does. It prohibits any act of Congress to abridge - ummmm MU - 3/18 13:52:19
                              if that were true, there would be opposition to the bill on - zounami MU - 3/18 14:06:14
                                   That's because politicians DGAF about the constitution. (nm) - ummmm MU - 3/18 15:26:07
                                   lol(nm) - meatiger MU - 3/18 14:13:29
                                        is there a point you're trying to make? (nm) - zounami MU - 3/18 14:17:25
                                             Has constitutionality stopped Congress from passing bills - meatiger MU - 3/18 14:19:29
                                                  yes, in many cases (nm) - zounami MU - 3/18 14:25:22
                                                       how has the constitution stopped those instances?(nm) - CulturedDan MU - 3/18 14:28:12
                                                            via the judicial branch (nm) - zounami MU - 3/18 14:30:17
                    Gov't contacting social media sites and demanding speech be - MIZ45 MU - 3/18 13:37:03
     I just posted about this. It's unbelievable, a SC justice - zounami MU - 3/18 13:17:52
          so the same as Jim Jordan et al - JG MU - 3/18 13:43:18
          ...(and no respect for it, either) - zounami MU - 3/18 13:18:12
               so like every trumplican - JG MU - 3/18 13:43:57




©2024 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard