Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

zero confusion over here

Posted on: March 4, 2024 at 11:43:29 CT
ashtray UF
Posts:
111045
Member For:
22.49 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
can't say as much on your side. plenty of it to go around
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

I believe the SCOTUS decision to be correct. If Colorado, - Ozland Tiger LSU - 3/4 09:59:38
     SCOTUS overstepped its “authority” here - pickle MU - 3/4 10:02:07
          but congress decides if someone committed "insurrection" - tigerinhogtown STL - 3/4 11:28:47
          I really what to agree with you on this, but that office - tcat KC - 3/4 11:08:53
               Two seperate issues - o'lineydisciple MU - 3/4 11:15:21
          RE: SCOTUS overstepped its “authority” here - patriot MU - 3/4 10:56:11
          You are incorrect (as usual) - Spanky KU - 3/4 10:07:02
               That doesn't say anything about the POTUS - Sal CMSU - 3/4 10:20:02
                    According to the Supreme Court, States may only disqualify - BH O'bonga MU - 3/4 10:59:56
                         RE: According to the Supreme Court, States may only disqualify - BH O'bonga MU - 3/4 12:17:17
                         where is that in the Constitution? (nm) - pickle MU - 3/4 11:24:42
                    1) That is how it is spelled in the Constitution - Spanky KU - 3/4 10:26:24
                         RE: 1) That is how it is spelled in the Constitution - BH O'bonga MU - 3/4 11:00:30
               don't let your autism get in your way(nm) - CulturedDan MU - 3/4 10:16:40
                    Nice argument. - Spanky KU - 3/4 10:32:39
                    Even with autism he posts circles around you and the like..n - tigertix MU - 3/4 10:18:55
                         My nephew is on the specturm - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 3/4 10:32:56
                         😂 - Panthera MU - 3/4 10:25:27
                         k(nm) - CulturedDan MU - 3/4 10:23:08
               Why would you look to Article I in regards to a - ummmm MU - 3/4 10:08:51
                    Because that is the Elections Clause. - Spanky KU - 3/4 10:32:12
                         That has nothing to do with the election of the President - ummmm MU - 3/4 10:59:06
                              It does.(nm) - Spanky KU - 3/4 13:10:20
                         correct. The state can literally say "we will hold a popular - CulturedDan MU - 3/4 10:42:30
                              It cannot exclude candidates for POTUS that meet - Spanky KU - 3/4 11:00:37
                              No. It cannot(nm) - Spanky KU - 3/4 10:50:54
                                   if you say so(nm) - CulturedDan MU - 3/4 10:53:49
                         the US Constitution's purpose isn't to grant powers to the - ashtray UF - 3/4 10:41:22
                              You are the confused one on this topic(nm) - Spanky KU - 3/4 10:51:38
                                   not at all (nm) - ashtray UF - 3/4 10:54:30
                                        Yes. Completely (nm) - Spanky KU - 3/4 11:02:45
                                             zero confusion over here - ashtray UF - 3/4 11:43:29
          so in that case, if they took him off the ballot - Fire Marshall Bill MU - 3/4 10:06:31
               i don’t know. i haven’t read every state’s constitution - pickle MU - 3/4 10:09:07
          Nope. constitution sets the qualifications - tman MU - 3/4 10:05:49
               Correct, how to hold their elections is not deciding who can - tigertix MU - 3/4 10:17:03
                    the constitution sets qualification for eligibility - pickle MU - 3/4 10:18:22
                         Obviously, you haven't read the decision....nm - tigertix MU - 3/4 10:25:06
                              and he do3snt want to follow constitution(nm) - tman MU - 3/4 11:04:53




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard