Welcome Guest

It is the supreme law of the land

Posted on: February 20, 2024 at 13:58:18 CT

4TigersinMichigan MU

Posts:

123699

Member For:

22.18 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

Which means the states can do as they wish up to violating or contradicting what is laid out in the Constitution.

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

Anyone arguing that the State of Texas is defying the SCOTUS - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 2/20 13:02:16

Well get it done and kwithebishing - JayHoaxH8r MU

- 2/20 14:59:13

Pro crime republican supporting lawlessness - JG MU

- 2/20 13:33:13

You would support cash and rental cars for illegals - mu7176grad MU - 2/20 13:46:46

Well- I would not and do not and have not - JG MU

- 2/20 13:52:17

The SC didn't say what Texas could or couldn't do (nm) - Sal CMSU - 2/20 13:37:02

They did need to grant access to the border - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 2/20 13:38:48

Good to know you support states rights today(nm) - meatiger MU - 2/20 13:19:17

I nearly always do - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 2/20 13:20:47

No you don't - JayHoaxH8r MU

- 2/20 15:02:39

only when it pertains to an issue you agree with - ashtray UF - 2/20 13:43:48

you don’t (nm) - pickle MU

- 2/20 13:25:36

Like running elections? - meatiger MU - 2/20 13:22:46

States run their own elections - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 2/20 13:24:37

so you think the Constitution was written for the states? - ashtray UF - 2/20 13:44:43

No - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 2/20 13:46:34

dude you can't know how hilarious you are (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 2/20 18:25:36

lmfao (nm) - pickle MU

- 2/20 13:53:06

to control the states? (nm) - ashtray UF - 2/20 13:48:03

I would say to control them is a bit heavy - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 2/20 13:50:21

not in the manner you think. read the constitution - pickle MU

- 2/20 13:57:53

you really should educate yourself - ashtray UF - 2/20 13:53:52

It is the supreme law of the land - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 2/20 13:58:18

lol, my man, you sure are uneducated, ignorant (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 2/20 18:26:46

no. that is 100% incorrect - pickle MU

- 2/20 14:02:44

No it is not - meatiger MU - 2/20 14:00:38

But state consitutions cannot violate the US Constitution - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 2/20 14:04:18

there are only few specific instances in the constitution - pickle MU

- 2/20 14:08:45

false (nm) - pickle MU

- 2/20 13:25:51

RE: States run their own elections - meatiger MU - 2/20 13:25:48

he’s never read the constitution - pickle MU

- 2/20 13:27:24

In our system, they are the branch charged wtih making - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 2/20 13:27:12

RE: In our system, they are the branch charged wtih making - meatiger MU - 2/20 13:28:57

Tell me about that - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 2/20 13:30:45

I am talking about your logical inconsistencies - meatiger MU - 2/20 13:32:00

Texas did stop - that is the point - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 2/20 13:32:44

RE: Texas did stop - that is the point - meatiger MU - 2/20 13:34:16

Oh good grief - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 2/20 13:38:05

Possibly - meatiger MU - 2/20 13:41:51

I will attempt to dumb it down - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 2/20 13:45:27

So your OP was nothing about State's rights - meatiger MU - 2/20 13:46:59

And here admitting you don't really know the issue at hand - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 2/20 13:49:11

Yes, I mistakenly called you a State's rights guy - meatiger MU - 2/20 13:54:21

I am a state's rights guy - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 2/20 14:11:30

you most definitely are not. you are confused - pickle MU

- 2/20 14:15:16

incorrect. Article III, Section 2 - pickle MU

- 2/20 13:28:54

lol you just cannot be consistent (nm) - pickle MU

- 2/20 13:15:01

Sometimes you're just brutal.(nm) - Toger STL - 2/20 13:05:04