Welcome Guest

Possibly

Posted on: February 20, 2024 at 13:41:51 CT

meatiger MU

Posts:

127341

Member For:

25.80 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

In the OP:

You stated

They are doing exactly what they should be doing, in reference to defying the USSC.

Then you claim

"Texas did stop - that is the point"

Which is it?

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

Anyone arguing that the State of Texas is defying the SCOTUS - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 2/20 13:02:16

Well get it done and kwithebishing - JayHoaxH8r MU

- 2/20 14:59:13

Pro crime republican supporting lawlessness - JG MU

- 2/20 13:33:13

You would support cash and rental cars for illegals - mu7176grad MU - 2/20 13:46:46

Well- I would not and do not and have not - JG MU

- 2/20 13:52:17

The SC didn't say what Texas could or couldn't do (nm) - Sal CMSU - 2/20 13:37:02

They did need to grant access to the border - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 2/20 13:38:48

Good to know you support states rights today(nm) - meatiger MU - 2/20 13:19:17

I nearly always do - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 2/20 13:20:47

No you don't - JayHoaxH8r MU

- 2/20 15:02:39

only when it pertains to an issue you agree with - ashtray UF - 2/20 13:43:48

you don’t (nm) - pickle MU

- 2/20 13:25:36

Like running elections? - meatiger MU - 2/20 13:22:46

States run their own elections - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 2/20 13:24:37

so you think the Constitution was written for the states? - ashtray UF - 2/20 13:44:43

No - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 2/20 13:46:34

dude you can't know how hilarious you are (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 2/20 18:25:36

lmfao (nm) - pickle MU

- 2/20 13:53:06

to control the states? (nm) - ashtray UF - 2/20 13:48:03

I would say to control them is a bit heavy - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 2/20 13:50:21

not in the manner you think. read the constitution - pickle MU

- 2/20 13:57:53

you really should educate yourself - ashtray UF - 2/20 13:53:52

It is the supreme law of the land - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 2/20 13:58:18

lol, my man, you sure are uneducated, ignorant (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 2/20 18:26:46

no. that is 100% incorrect - pickle MU

- 2/20 14:02:44

No it is not - meatiger MU - 2/20 14:00:38

But state consitutions cannot violate the US Constitution - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 2/20 14:04:18

there are only few specific instances in the constitution - pickle MU

- 2/20 14:08:45

false (nm) - pickle MU

- 2/20 13:25:51

RE: States run their own elections - meatiger MU - 2/20 13:25:48

he’s never read the constitution - pickle MU

- 2/20 13:27:24

In our system, they are the branch charged wtih making - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 2/20 13:27:12

RE: In our system, they are the branch charged wtih making - meatiger MU - 2/20 13:28:57

Tell me about that - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 2/20 13:30:45

I am talking about your logical inconsistencies - meatiger MU - 2/20 13:32:00

Texas did stop - that is the point - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 2/20 13:32:44

RE: Texas did stop - that is the point - meatiger MU - 2/20 13:34:16

Oh good grief - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 2/20 13:38:05

Possibly - meatiger MU - 2/20 13:41:51

I will attempt to dumb it down - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 2/20 13:45:27

So your OP was nothing about State's rights - meatiger MU - 2/20 13:46:59

And here admitting you don't really know the issue at hand - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 2/20 13:49:11

Yes, I mistakenly called you a State's rights guy - meatiger MU - 2/20 13:54:21

I am a state's rights guy - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 2/20 14:11:30

you most definitely are not. you are confused - pickle MU

- 2/20 14:15:16

incorrect. Article III, Section 2 - pickle MU

- 2/20 13:28:54

lol you just cannot be consistent (nm) - pickle MU

- 2/20 13:15:01

Sometimes you're just brutal.(nm) - Toger STL - 2/20 13:05:04