You always change the subject you deceitful schit. The

Posted on: February 17, 2024 at 13:46:44 CT

The question concerns the law and criminality, and in my opinion, your question centered around, who gets to make the laws and decide what the laws should be?

A hint for you princess, it ain't you.

ML King broke the laws with civil disobedience and was jailed. The laws were eventually changed. There were, there remain, and there will always be unjust, unfair, and unnecessary laws on the books. The question is if someone violates one of those laws, is he a criminal?

Yes.

Or should each person decide which laws are good, decent and just… And which ones he can ignore? That is anarchy, and that is what you really want if you were honest. Which you are certainly not.

You see honey, when the government passes a law, it's debated, argued, voted upon and codified into law. It's there for all to see and know about.

Your insane versions of law, natural law, assume that everybody just understands everything. No need to write it down, no need to vote on it, no need to clarify things, and no need to ever amend anything. People just know it.

Obviously Hitler was unaware of your natural laws, so really princess what good are they? Mso yes tung wasn't aware of, or at least didn't abide by your stupid natural laws either. Likewise Stalin, likewise Genghis Khan, the Vikings, and today the muzz are not adherents of natural laws.

You live in a fantasy world unicorns rainbows everybody gets along, because everybody just… Knows.

No, they don't.