Welcome Guest

I didn't 'scour the internet' for that article, I happened

Posted on: February 1, 2024 at 16:40:46 CT
JeffB MU
Posts:
70119
Member For:
20.96 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
to see it while reading another article. But that is, of course, irrelevant to the issue at hand.

I agree with him that Rothbard's 'Rights of the Child' are the result of following libertarian principles to their 'logical' conclusions.

But that doesn't prove that the original principles are true or even good. In fact, I think this is a prime example of a recuctio ad absurdum... following the premises to their 'logical conclusions' results in absurd conclusions.

Do you personally subscribe to Rothbard's conclusions regarding the "Rights of a Child"?
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

     There is no simple answer to this - meatiger MU - 2/1 22:07:45
          Do you agree with Rothbard, then? 1. Draw the line at - JeffB MU - 2/1 22:25:07
               I do not like any of them - meatiger MU - 2/2 00:30:33
                    Jeff can’t even understand the premise - pickle MU - 2/2 06:45:35
                         Spell out the premise for us pickle. No need for you to hide - JeffB MU - 2/2 11:08:43
          RE: I see you've invested enough time to scour the internet for - *M* KC - 2/1 17:30:29
          I didn't 'scour the internet' for that article, I happened - JeffB MU - 2/1 16:40:46
          it’s beyond his understanding (nm) - pickle MU - 2/1 16:36:20
               I see that you are once again too cowardly to defend your - JeffB MU - 2/1 16:42:11
     I'm betting we wait awhile for HIS explanation, - GA Tiger MU - 2/1 16:17:15




©2024 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard