When something good happens for Trump, it's the worst thing possible.
Wouldn't this "special master" prove that Trump broke the law, or does a Democrat have to prove that?
Also, I love how the NY Times had to let you know the history of the judge and who appointed them for when the rule for trump, but don't when the judge rules against trump. It's almost like they want people to think the judiciary is partisan, but only Repub appointed judges. I see why JG and Doc believe this now, their masters tell them to.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/deeply-problematic-experts-judges-intervention-120003066.html