Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

What narrative are you referring to?

Posted on: May 31, 2022 at 12:48:30 CT
tigerdb MU
Posts:
58158
Member For:
23.72 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
"collusion" is 4never's word.

Clearly the trump campaign was working with the russians, and it's something that should have been investigated (and the level to which they were working was most likely glossed over.)

Is trump a russian asset - or merely a unwitting fool? Probably the latter - which isn't a crime.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Clinton supporters vote Sussmann not guilty...suprise! Nm - BandG MU - 5/31 11:02:50
     BAHAHAA BUT MUH DURHAM REPORT - JayHoaxH8r MU - 5/31 12:07:44
          DURHAM REPORT: There is no such thing. Clown suit for you, - BH O'bonga MU - 5/31 13:28:53
          Durham Report Correctly show that Democrats can not be - mu4ever DUKE - 5/31 12:08:45
               Where is this durham report that you speak of? - tigerdb MU - 5/31 12:13:22
                    Yes, so we can Impeach Brandon? LOL - mu4ever DUKE - 5/31 12:17:59
                    Why? - Sal CMSU - 5/31 12:15:11
                         Because he's stealing millions frim the taxpayers and has - tigerdb MU - 5/31 12:20:05
                              LMFAO this is a coverup? For what?? (nm) - Sal CMSU - 5/31 12:20:51
                                   It's a GOP effort to make the Mueller Report into something - tigerdb MU - 5/31 12:28:55
                                        lol, Mook admittied on the stand - mizzouSECedes STL - 5/31 12:33:29
                                             What hoax are you referring to? - tigerdb MU - 5/31 12:34:50
                                                  Mueller didn't address "collusion" - why do pubs twist his - tigerdb MU - 5/31 12:41:20
                                                       Because Dems used 'collusion' when they meant 'criminal - Spanky KU - 5/31 15:36:03
                                                       There was never evidence of a crime - Sal CMSU - 5/31 12:54:02
                                                            You know more than the FBI - JayHoaxH8r MU - 5/31 12:55:53
                                                                 RE: You know more than the FBI - Sal CMSU - 5/31 12:59:50
                                                  Russia collusion hoax - mizzouSECedes STL - 5/31 12:36:48
                                                       There was no "collusion hoax" - tigerdb MU - 5/31 12:45:02
                                                            Clinton's Campaign manager said it was - mizzouSECedes STL - 5/31 12:47:39
                                                                 No he didn't - and even if he did (which he didn't), it - tigerdb MU - 5/31 13:05:04
                                                                      Meeting with Russians isn't a crime either - Sal CMSU - 5/31 13:05:53
                                                                           one meeting might not be worthy of an investigation, - tigerdb MU - 5/31 13:16:16
                                                                                Add them up for us all then - Sal CMSU - 5/31 13:19:09
                                                                 Worked for clinton so must be a liar - JayHoaxH8r MU - 5/31 12:56:44
                                                  Then why did Mueller fail to act? (nm) - Sal CMSU - 5/31 12:35:38
                                                       Mueller didn't address "collusion" - why do pubs twist his - tigerdb MU - 5/31 12:42:56
                                                            So he shot your entire narrative down - Sal CMSU - 5/31 12:43:54
                                                                 What narrative are you referring to? - tigerdb MU - 5/31 12:48:30
                                                                      The entire Russian collusion narrative that the left - Sal CMSU - 5/31 12:53:19
                                                                           Why did the trump team share its polling data with the - tigerdb MU - 5/31 13:12:37
                                                                                Where did that information end up, exactly? - Sal CMSU - 5/31 13:18:08
                                                                                     talk about deflection(nm) - tigerdb MU - 5/31 13:23:17
                                                                                          How is that a deflection? - Sal CMSU - 5/31 13:29:08
                                                                                               Why did trump's campaign share polling data with the - tigerdb MU - 5/31 13:49:40
                                                                                                    Do you have a link with proof - Sal CMSU - 5/31 13:51:38
                                                                                                         but hey, that's not colluding - right? - tigerdb MU - 5/31 14:00:07
                                                                                                              I've already addressed that - Sal CMSU - 5/31 14:07:35
                                                                                                                   "prove where it wound up" - it wound up in russia, - tigerdb MU - 5/31 14:24:31
                                                                                                                        The Senate had no clue where the data ended up - Sal CMSU - 5/31 14:30:06
                                        CONSPIRACY!!! (nm) - Sal CMSU - 5/31 12:29:34
                    Let him keep going. - JayHoaxH8r MU - 5/31 12:14:21
                         this you? - Sal CMSU - 5/31 12:18:21
                              RE: this you? - JayHoaxH8r MU - 5/31 12:19:19
                                   Simply pointing out the conspiracies you - Sal CMSU - 5/31 12:20:28
                                        Mueller got some guilty verdicts - JayHoaxH8r MU - 5/31 12:22:20
                                             dumb ass - dangertim MU - 5/31 12:25:38
                                                  He's rolling now - JayHoaxH8r MU - 5/31 12:26:43
                                                       deflecting from your false statement(nm) - dangertim MU - 5/31 12:38:53
                                                            Ok . How about "VERDICTS" - JayHoaxH8r MU - 5/31 12:56:21
                                             lmfao for what, exactly? - Sal CMSU - 5/31 12:23:29
                                                  They actually lied under oath protecting donnieboy - JayHoaxH8r MU - 5/31 12:25:22
                                                       Oh so nothing to confirm your conspiracy theories? (nm) - Sal CMSU - 5/31 12:26:18
                                                            L - JayHoaxH8r MU - 5/31 12:26:55
               cant even win this easy case - JayHoaxH8r MU - 5/31 12:10:25
                    Why is this case easy? (nm) - mizzouSECedes STL - 5/31 12:29:15
                    Clearly biased jurors and judge. You all are in a sting - mu4ever DUKE - 5/31 12:19:17
                         It's clearly a mass conspiracy - JayHoaxH8r MU - 5/31 12:22:58
                              RE: It's clearly a mass conspiracy - Sal CMSU - 5/31 12:23:45
                                   Why do you do this? - JayHoaxH8r MU - 5/31 12:25:54
                                        Do you believe Durham is covering something up? (nm) - Sal CMSU - 5/31 12:26:40
                                             I didn't say he was - JayHoaxH8r MU - 5/31 12:27:11
                                                  I never said you did - Sal CMSU - 5/31 12:27:34
                                                       You're literally a woman - JayHoaxH8r MU - 5/31 12:28:16
                                                            You assumed his gender - mizzouSECedes STL - 5/31 12:40:08
                                                                 A B is a B - JayHoaxH8r MU - 5/31 12:59:11
     LOL, when trump's hatchet guy can't actually prove that - tigerdb MU - 5/31 11:51:36
          Sussmann billed Hillary for the meeting, but this evidence - BH O'bonga MU - 5/31 11:55:56
               Certainly dunham couldn't prove that sussman billed hillary - tigerdb MU - 5/31 12:03:53
          The judge should have tossed some jurors out - Sal CMSU - 5/31 11:54:42
               Obama judge(nm) - Spanky KU - 5/31 12:08:34
               Which ones and why? - Mormad MU - 5/31 11:57:24
                    all of them, because the finding was unanimous(nm) - tigerdb MU - 5/31 12:04:34
                    Yes, a few were Clinton donors - Sal CMSU - 5/31 11:59:08
                         DC is heavily blue - DesertTiger MU - 5/31 12:01:25
                              agreed (nm) - Sal CMSU - 5/31 12:08:11
     The fix was in. Corrupt democrats - drywallerdave MU - 5/31 11:25:08
          The fix was in: Correct. Sussmann's guilt was never in - BH O'bonga MU - 5/31 11:31:12
     Sad day. We officially have 2 systems of justice. - RHAYWORTH MU - 5/31 11:24:25
          It's been that way for a while (nm) - Sal CMSU - 5/31 11:31:20
               True, but they at least tried to hide it. - RHAYWORTH MU - 5/31 11:42:44




©2024 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard