Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

What hoax are you referring to?

Posted on: May 31, 2022 at 12:34:50 CT
tigerdb MU
Posts:
58158
Member For:
23.72 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
There's only one hoax here, and it's John Durham.

The trump team was working with the rooskies - that's a fact.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Clinton supporters vote Sussmann not guilty...suprise! Nm - BandG MU - 5/31 11:02:50
     BAHAHAA BUT MUH DURHAM REPORT - JayHoaxH8r MU - 5/31 12:07:44
          DURHAM REPORT: There is no such thing. Clown suit for you, - BH O'bonga MU - 5/31 13:28:53
          Durham Report Correctly show that Democrats can not be - mu4ever DUKE - 5/31 12:08:45
               Where is this durham report that you speak of? - tigerdb MU - 5/31 12:13:22
                    Yes, so we can Impeach Brandon? LOL - mu4ever DUKE - 5/31 12:17:59
                    Why? - Sal CMSU - 5/31 12:15:11
                         Because he's stealing millions frim the taxpayers and has - tigerdb MU - 5/31 12:20:05
                              LMFAO this is a coverup? For what?? (nm) - Sal CMSU - 5/31 12:20:51
                                   It's a GOP effort to make the Mueller Report into something - tigerdb MU - 5/31 12:28:55
                                        lol, Mook admittied on the stand - mizzouSECedes STL - 5/31 12:33:29
                                             What hoax are you referring to? - tigerdb MU - 5/31 12:34:50
                                                  Mueller didn't address "collusion" - why do pubs twist his - tigerdb MU - 5/31 12:41:20
                                                       Because Dems used 'collusion' when they meant 'criminal - Spanky KU - 5/31 15:36:03
                                                       There was never evidence of a crime - Sal CMSU - 5/31 12:54:02
                                                            You know more than the FBI - JayHoaxH8r MU - 5/31 12:55:53
                                                                 RE: You know more than the FBI - Sal CMSU - 5/31 12:59:50
                                                  Russia collusion hoax - mizzouSECedes STL - 5/31 12:36:48
                                                       There was no "collusion hoax" - tigerdb MU - 5/31 12:45:02
                                                            Clinton's Campaign manager said it was - mizzouSECedes STL - 5/31 12:47:39
                                                                 No he didn't - and even if he did (which he didn't), it - tigerdb MU - 5/31 13:05:04
                                                                      Meeting with Russians isn't a crime either - Sal CMSU - 5/31 13:05:53
                                                                           one meeting might not be worthy of an investigation, - tigerdb MU - 5/31 13:16:16
                                                                                Add them up for us all then - Sal CMSU - 5/31 13:19:09
                                                                 Worked for clinton so must be a liar - JayHoaxH8r MU - 5/31 12:56:44
                                                  Then why did Mueller fail to act? (nm) - Sal CMSU - 5/31 12:35:38
                                                       Mueller didn't address "collusion" - why do pubs twist his - tigerdb MU - 5/31 12:42:56
                                                            So he shot your entire narrative down - Sal CMSU - 5/31 12:43:54
                                                                 What narrative are you referring to? - tigerdb MU - 5/31 12:48:30
                                                                      The entire Russian collusion narrative that the left - Sal CMSU - 5/31 12:53:19
                                                                           Why did the trump team share its polling data with the - tigerdb MU - 5/31 13:12:37
                                                                                Where did that information end up, exactly? - Sal CMSU - 5/31 13:18:08
                                                                                     talk about deflection(nm) - tigerdb MU - 5/31 13:23:17
                                                                                          How is that a deflection? - Sal CMSU - 5/31 13:29:08
                                                                                               Why did trump's campaign share polling data with the - tigerdb MU - 5/31 13:49:40
                                                                                                    Do you have a link with proof - Sal CMSU - 5/31 13:51:38
                                                                                                         but hey, that's not colluding - right? - tigerdb MU - 5/31 14:00:07
                                                                                                              I've already addressed that - Sal CMSU - 5/31 14:07:35
                                                                                                                   "prove where it wound up" - it wound up in russia, - tigerdb MU - 5/31 14:24:31
                                                                                                                        The Senate had no clue where the data ended up - Sal CMSU - 5/31 14:30:06
                                        CONSPIRACY!!! (nm) - Sal CMSU - 5/31 12:29:34
                    Let him keep going. - JayHoaxH8r MU - 5/31 12:14:21
                         this you? - Sal CMSU - 5/31 12:18:21
                              RE: this you? - JayHoaxH8r MU - 5/31 12:19:19
                                   Simply pointing out the conspiracies you - Sal CMSU - 5/31 12:20:28
                                        Mueller got some guilty verdicts - JayHoaxH8r MU - 5/31 12:22:20
                                             dumb ass - dangertim MU - 5/31 12:25:38
                                                  He's rolling now - JayHoaxH8r MU - 5/31 12:26:43
                                                       deflecting from your false statement(nm) - dangertim MU - 5/31 12:38:53
                                                            Ok . How about "VERDICTS" - JayHoaxH8r MU - 5/31 12:56:21
                                             lmfao for what, exactly? - Sal CMSU - 5/31 12:23:29
                                                  They actually lied under oath protecting donnieboy - JayHoaxH8r MU - 5/31 12:25:22
                                                       Oh so nothing to confirm your conspiracy theories? (nm) - Sal CMSU - 5/31 12:26:18
                                                            L - JayHoaxH8r MU - 5/31 12:26:55
               cant even win this easy case - JayHoaxH8r MU - 5/31 12:10:25
                    Why is this case easy? (nm) - mizzouSECedes STL - 5/31 12:29:15
                    Clearly biased jurors and judge. You all are in a sting - mu4ever DUKE - 5/31 12:19:17
                         It's clearly a mass conspiracy - JayHoaxH8r MU - 5/31 12:22:58
                              RE: It's clearly a mass conspiracy - Sal CMSU - 5/31 12:23:45
                                   Why do you do this? - JayHoaxH8r MU - 5/31 12:25:54
                                        Do you believe Durham is covering something up? (nm) - Sal CMSU - 5/31 12:26:40
                                             I didn't say he was - JayHoaxH8r MU - 5/31 12:27:11
                                                  I never said you did - Sal CMSU - 5/31 12:27:34
                                                       You're literally a woman - JayHoaxH8r MU - 5/31 12:28:16
                                                            You assumed his gender - mizzouSECedes STL - 5/31 12:40:08
                                                                 A B is a B - JayHoaxH8r MU - 5/31 12:59:11
     LOL, when trump's hatchet guy can't actually prove that - tigerdb MU - 5/31 11:51:36
          Sussmann billed Hillary for the meeting, but this evidence - BH O'bonga MU - 5/31 11:55:56
               Certainly dunham couldn't prove that sussman billed hillary - tigerdb MU - 5/31 12:03:53
          The judge should have tossed some jurors out - Sal CMSU - 5/31 11:54:42
               Obama judge(nm) - Spanky KU - 5/31 12:08:34
               Which ones and why? - Mormad MU - 5/31 11:57:24
                    all of them, because the finding was unanimous(nm) - tigerdb MU - 5/31 12:04:34
                    Yes, a few were Clinton donors - Sal CMSU - 5/31 11:59:08
                         DC is heavily blue - DesertTiger MU - 5/31 12:01:25
                              agreed (nm) - Sal CMSU - 5/31 12:08:11
     The fix was in. Corrupt democrats - drywallerdave MU - 5/31 11:25:08
          The fix was in: Correct. Sussmann's guilt was never in - BH O'bonga MU - 5/31 11:31:12
     Sad day. We officially have 2 systems of justice. - RHAYWORTH MU - 5/31 11:24:25
          It's been that way for a while (nm) - Sal CMSU - 5/31 11:31:20
               True, but they at least tried to hide it. - RHAYWORTH MU - 5/31 11:42:44




©2024 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard