 |
|
their math is horrible
Posted on: March 2, 2022 at 10:35:13 CT
meatiger MU
Posts:
133119
Member For:
26.45 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
the first part:
Explaining that their sample includes 10,937,716 insured clients, with available data covering only the first 7½ months of 2021, their company had already logged 216,695 cases of adverse reactions for COVID-19 gene-based injections.
That is 1.98%
They then extrapolate that (bad idea, but ok)
Extending this rate for the full year, and then applying it to the full population of Germany (around 83 million), one can estimate that likely 2.5 million to 3 million individuals in the nation were treated by medical professionals for such adverse events.
That is 3.6%
Then they say this...
This is a “significant alarm signal,” he said in his letter, as it “means around 4-5% of the vaccinated were under medical treatment for side effects,” a rate about 10 times higher than the government’s reported numbers.
How to they get to 4-5%???
Explaining that their sample includes 10,937,716 insured clients, with available data covering only the first 7½ months of 2021, their company had already logged 216,695 cases of adverse reactions for COVID-19 gene-based injections.
That is 1.98%
They then extrapolate that (bad idea, but ok)
Extending this rate for the full year, and then applying it to the full population of Germany (around 83 million), one can estimate that likely 2.5 million to 3 million individuals in the nation were treated by medical professionals for such adverse events.
That is 3.6%
Then they say this...
This is a “significant alarm signal,” he said in his letter, as it “means around 4-5% of the vaccinated were under medical treatment for side effects,” a rate about 10 times higher than the government’s reported numbers.
How to they get to 4-5%???
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
- 
their math is horrible - meatiger MU - 3/2 10:35:13