Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

So you believe even though the Constitution sets forth

Posted on: January 28, 2022 at 14:29:35 CT
TigerJackSwartz MU
Posts:
64113
Member For:
16.79 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
no qualifications for Supreme Court nominations, that Title VII proscribes limits on a President's ability to nominate?

https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/faq_general.aspx

"The Constitution does not specify qualifications for Justices"
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

4smugs gets asked what law was violated - meatiger MU - 1/28 13:58:55
     sounds like something JG would type. ironic, isn't it? (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 1/28 16:35:44
          Oh look. Dummy swooped in before the early bird dinner(nm) - meatiger MU - 1/28 16:57:34
     It’s in the Declaration of Independence(nm) - El-ahrairah BAMA - 1/28 14:17:10
     Title VII of the Civil Rights Act - Spanky KU - 1/28 14:09:48
          Thanks for at least providing some actual information(nm) - meatiger MU - 1/28 15:07:10
          So you believe even though the Constitution sets forth - TigerJackSwartz MU - 1/28 14:29:35
               So you're saying Reagan promising to appoint a woman - SparkyStalcup MU - 1/28 19:21:10
                    No - Spanky KU - 1/28 20:09:10
               Yeah I don't think that Title VII applies - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/28 14:37:56
                    anyone who was passed over based on their race - Spanky KU - 1/28 14:51:16
                         a supreme court justice is not "hired" lol - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/28 14:59:42
                              Is an Ambassador hired? - Spanky KU - 1/28 15:07:42
                                   no an ambassador is appointed(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/28 15:10:27
                                        and placed on the federal payroll - Spanky KU - 1/28 15:16:42
                                             I don't care enough to research it but aren't appointees - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/28 15:20:57
                         how would you know if you were passed over?(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/28 14:55:51
                              If you are a white male or female federal judge you will be - Spanky KU - 1/28 15:00:25
                                   just following this to its ridiculous conclusion - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/28 15:05:18
                                        Likely a payoff - Spanky KU - 1/28 15:56:27
                         judges aren't in competitive federal service - TigerJackSwartz MU - 1/28 14:52:48
                              The only federal employees exempted (per your link) are: - Spanky KU - 1/28 14:54:38
                                   no, it doesn't say "this applies to all federal employees" - TigerJackSwartz MU - 1/28 14:59:35
                                        A judge is a federal employee(nm) - Spanky KU - 1/28 15:29:29
                                             but not subject to Title VII (nm) - TigerJackSwartz MU - 1/28 15:35:24
                                                  "[1] Title VII and the ADA apply to employers (including - Spanky KU - 1/28 16:05:19
                                                       "Employees of the judicial branch of government not covered - TigerJackSwartz MU - 1/28 16:46:47
                    It may not - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/28 14:48:10
                         It does not, per its terms. Perhaps your "clearly illegal" - TigerJackSwartz MU - 1/28 14:49:12
                    It's technically a hire - Sal CMSU - 1/28 14:38:27
                         The president doesn't "hire" he nominates - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/28 14:39:12
                              he 'recruits' - Spanky KU - 1/28 14:52:47
                              He starts the process - Sal CMSU - 1/28 14:40:32
                                   Yeah I don't know but I think there has to be a distinction - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/28 14:46:24
                                        Any qualified person who was discriminated against based on - Spanky KU - 1/28 14:56:49
                                             there are no qualifications for SCOTUS (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 1/28 15:33:09
                                        I have no doubt the gov't has the ability - Sal CMSU - 1/28 14:47:17
                                             no argument there(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/28 14:50:16
               Yes. - Spanky KU - 1/28 14:35:01
                    Setting apart the constitutional question, have you even - TigerJackSwartz MU - 1/28 14:43:10
                         Judges are not exempted by that - Spanky KU - 1/28 14:57:56
                              But they are not included in the list of inclusions (nm) - TigerJackSwartz MU - 1/28 15:02:20
                                   They are not in the list of exclusions(nm) - Spanky KU - 1/28 16:06:30
               So the feds can go after companies - Sal CMSU - 1/28 14:30:43
                    you got it perfectly - meatiger MU - 1/28 15:04:28
                    Not sure I'm following, are you suggesting that companies - TigerJackSwartz MU - 1/28 14:32:02
                         Nobody has suggested that (nm) - Sal CMSU - 1/28 14:32:32
                              spanky has suggested that Biden has violated Title VII - TigerJackSwartz MU - 1/28 14:33:20
                                   If the POTUS can hire based off race and sex - Sal CMSU - 1/28 14:34:30
                                        oops (nm) - TigerJackSwartz MU - 1/28 14:46:43
                                        I thought POTUS could not nominate an SC Justice - TigerJackSwartz MU - 1/28 14:36:50
                                             stop deflecting and answer the question (nm) - Sal CMSU - 1/28 14:38:00
                                                  well the initial question is whether Biden's stated - TigerJackSwartz MU - 1/28 14:44:01
                                                       RE: well the initial question is whether Biden's stated - Sal CMSU - 1/28 14:44:30
                                                            I'll be happy answer your secondary question - TigerJackSwartz MU - 1/28 14:47:57
                                                                 No clue - Sal CMSU - 1/28 14:50:36
          It is a very meaty Friday - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/28 14:12:34
     This is a hokie-esque post(nm) - Wildcat KSU - 1/28 14:07:50
     still tryna dance with 4Tigs every day I see(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/28 13:59:53




©2024 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard