Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

Biden is not "hiring" a Supreme Court justice. Biden is

Posted on: January 28, 2022 at 13:30:58 CT
TigerJackSwartz MU
Posts:
64113
Member For:
16.79 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
nominating one, under the process set forth in the Constitution.

Explain how a hiring law puts restrictions on a President in nominating a Supreme Court just, that are not set forth in the Constitution

It should be easy for you, since it is so "clear"
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Would love to see some moderate or liberal - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/28 11:27:55
     what law did Biden violate? (nm) - TigerJackSwartz MU - 1/28 13:10:54
          Title VII of the Civil Rights Act - Spanky KU - 1/28 14:09:16
          Ever hear of protected classes? - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/28 13:24:32
               What is the citation for that law? And where does that - TigerJackSwartz MU - 1/28 13:27:05
                    He admitted to it - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/28 13:28:02
                         Biden is not "hiring" a Supreme Court justice. Biden is - TigerJackSwartz MU - 1/28 13:30:58
          The Supreme Court Justice nomination law - meatiger MU - 1/28 13:13:56
               Interestingly, I just read that law - TigerJackSwartz MU - 1/28 13:16:44
     lol(nm) - meatiger MU - 1/28 13:08:58
     Clarence Thomas - Toger STL - 1/28 13:01:39
     Lumping Moderates and Liberals together is pure @ssery. - Spartus MWSC - 1/28 12:13:42
          What does that have to do with the discussion? - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/28 12:15:12
               The numbers that I gave you should speak volumes. With this - Spartus MWSC - 1/28 12:25:00
                    What does any of that have to do with the clear illegal - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/28 12:25:55
                         what law did Biden violate? (nm) - TigerJackSwartz MU - 1/28 13:19:25
                         He's admitting what Trump didn't admit. nm - Spartus MWSC - 1/28 12:29:41
                              Trump had a list out when he was a candidate - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/28 12:43:45
                                   Anyone not on the list - meatiger MU - 1/28 13:15:13
                                        On what grounds?(nm) - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/28 13:22:45
                                   How many Blacks and Mexicans were on Trumps list?nm - Spartus MWSC - 1/28 12:50:48
                                        I have no idea - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/28 12:55:45
                                             If it is "clear illegal discrimination" than point to the - TigerJackSwartz MU - 1/28 13:22:56
                                                  You cannot discriminate based on protected classes - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/28 13:25:07
                                                       Smugs, you have said repeatedly it is "clearly illegal" - TigerJackSwartz MU - 1/28 13:29:20
                                                            There are protected classes that cannot be used as - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/28 13:33:11
                                                                 Do those laws apply to a constitutionally specified - TigerJackSwartz MU - 1/28 13:42:47
                                                                 Yet affirmative action is both legal - meatiger MU - 1/28 13:35:07
     Discrimination is a good thing. - El-ahrairah BAMA - 1/28 11:59:17
          It's not at all like what Trump did - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/28 12:06:01
               It wasn’t a 2 horse race - El-ahrairah BAMA - 1/28 12:08:02
                    Trump put out a list of all those he would consider - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/28 12:09:27
                         What law did he break?(nm) - meatiger MU - 1/28 13:10:01
                              Illegal discrimination against protected classes - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/28 13:23:51
                                   Sounds like liberal bull****(nm) - El-ahrairah BAMA - 1/28 14:16:31
                                   they never covered discrimination of nomination process - meatiger MU - 1/28 13:33:34
                                   'Illegal discrimination' is just - mizzoumurfkc KC - 1/28 13:28:06
                                        That does not address the point - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/28 13:28:37
     All men should have sued - mizzoumurfkc KC - 1/28 11:43:41
          What was the standing of all males in making the mistake - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/28 11:45:25
               No - mizzoumurfkc KC - 1/28 11:49:56
                    All males would not have standing - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/28 11:54:12
     Could this case be used as a basis to sue? - Spanky KU - 1/28 11:40:51
          There are already cases on the book involving hiring - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/28 11:44:20
     Would it matter if she's a looker?(nm) - Toger STL - 1/28 11:30:12
          It apparently doesn't matter now - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/28 11:32:16




©2024 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard