Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

RE: 'under the current system'

Posted on: September 27, 2021 at 15:16:33 CT
meatiger MU
Posts:
133086
Member For:
26.44 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
yes..you asked if "are incapable of changing the direction of the nation's elected leaders?"

And my answer was..yes..they are incapable of changing direction under the current system. Because both parties under this system desire to grow government.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Question for the limited gvmt, conservative types here - pickle MU - 9/27 14:02:54
     Eliminate socialist dems. Problem solved. (nm) - Outsider MU - 9/27 14:23:26
     Education, and participation. - RHAYWORTH MU - 9/27 14:17:29
          how do you expect voting to make a difference? - pickle MU - 9/27 14:23:25
               3.5 trillion spending bill says otherwise. - RHAYWORTH MU - 9/27 14:47:00
                    That doesn't beat trumpies does it? - JayHoaxH8r MU - 9/27 14:53:26
                    yeah..the Pubs will counter with just 2 trillion of so(nm) - meatiger MU - 9/27 14:50:27
                    Have you forgotten Trump’s $6T “stimulus” already? (nm) - pickle MU - 9/27 14:49:41
                         But the dems wanted 10 trillion - meatiger MU - 9/27 14:50:47
                              You idiots routinely prove the point with your complaints. - RHAYWORTH MU - 9/27 14:58:16
                                   Lmfao no - pickle MU - 9/27 15:08:26
                                   How would have voting for Trump gotten less government - meatiger MU - 9/27 15:04:14
               As Dems made clear in 2020.(nm) - Outsider MU - 9/27 14:26:54
     Education of others(nm) - meatiger MU - 9/27 14:07:38
     What is you plan to eliminate government?(nm) - DHighlander NWMSU - 9/27 14:03:27
          education and non-participation (nm) - pickle MU - 9/27 14:11:12
               non-participation does nothing to the scope and size of - Spanky KU - 9/27 14:20:10
                    At what point - meatiger MU - 9/27 14:39:56
                         False equivalency in your hypothetical - Spanky KU - 9/27 14:42:56
                              Under the current system...yes(nm) - meatiger MU - 9/27 14:43:32
                                   What is the current system? How is it different than - Spanky KU - 9/27 14:47:14
                                        We have a two party system - meatiger MU - 9/27 14:49:41
                                             When did we have a 3 major party system? - Spanky KU - 9/27 14:59:23
                                                  we have not - meatiger MU - 9/27 15:03:18
                                                       Answer my question, please - Spanky KU - 9/27 15:13:10
                                                            RE: Answer my question, please - meatiger MU - 9/27 15:15:10
                                                                 None of them were favored by the 'Party Establishment" - Spanky KU - 9/27 15:57:35
                                                                      They all had people within the party establishment - meatiger MU - 9/27 16:02:23
                                                                           Who did Trump have within the 'Party Establishment'? - Spanky KU - 9/27 16:44:14
                                                       'under the current system' - Spanky KU - 9/27 15:10:50
                                                            RE: 'under the current system' - meatiger MU - 9/27 15:16:33
                                                                 How do you propose changing 'the current system' - Spanky KU - 9/27 15:59:02
                    Don't hold your breath waiting for an answer?(nm) - tman MU - 9/27 14:36:10




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard