Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

non-participation does nothing to the scope and size of

Posted on: September 27, 2021 at 14:20:10 CT
Spanky KU
Posts:
146265
Member For:
20.99 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
2
gummint. It only gives a larger voice to those who participate....

33% of eligible voters (80 million citizens) did not participate in the 2020 election. What did they accomplish?
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Question for the limited gvmt, conservative types here - pickle MU - 9/27 14:02:54
     Eliminate socialist dems. Problem solved. (nm) - Outsider MU - 9/27 14:23:26
     Education, and participation. - RHAYWORTH MU - 9/27 14:17:29
          how do you expect voting to make a difference? - pickle MU - 9/27 14:23:25
               3.5 trillion spending bill says otherwise. - RHAYWORTH MU - 9/27 14:47:00
                    That doesn't beat trumpies does it? - JayHoaxH8r MU - 9/27 14:53:26
                    yeah..the Pubs will counter with just 2 trillion of so(nm) - meatiger MU - 9/27 14:50:27
                    Have you forgotten Trump’s $6T “stimulus” already? (nm) - pickle MU - 9/27 14:49:41
                         But the dems wanted 10 trillion - meatiger MU - 9/27 14:50:47
                              You idiots routinely prove the point with your complaints. - RHAYWORTH MU - 9/27 14:58:16
                                   Lmfao no - pickle MU - 9/27 15:08:26
                                   How would have voting for Trump gotten less government - meatiger MU - 9/27 15:04:14
               As Dems made clear in 2020.(nm) - Outsider MU - 9/27 14:26:54
     Education of others(nm) - meatiger MU - 9/27 14:07:38
     What is you plan to eliminate government?(nm) - DHighlander NWMSU - 9/27 14:03:27
          education and non-participation (nm) - pickle MU - 9/27 14:11:12
               non-participation does nothing to the scope and size of - Spanky KU - 9/27 14:20:10
                    At what point - meatiger MU - 9/27 14:39:56
                         False equivalency in your hypothetical - Spanky KU - 9/27 14:42:56
                              Under the current system...yes(nm) - meatiger MU - 9/27 14:43:32
                                   What is the current system? How is it different than - Spanky KU - 9/27 14:47:14
                                        We have a two party system - meatiger MU - 9/27 14:49:41
                                             When did we have a 3 major party system? - Spanky KU - 9/27 14:59:23
                                                  we have not - meatiger MU - 9/27 15:03:18
                                                       Answer my question, please - Spanky KU - 9/27 15:13:10
                                                            RE: Answer my question, please - meatiger MU - 9/27 15:15:10
                                                                 None of them were favored by the 'Party Establishment" - Spanky KU - 9/27 15:57:35
                                                                      They all had people within the party establishment - meatiger MU - 9/27 16:02:23
                                                                           Who did Trump have within the 'Party Establishment'? - Spanky KU - 9/27 16:44:14
                                                       'under the current system' - Spanky KU - 9/27 15:10:50
                                                            RE: 'under the current system' - meatiger MU - 9/27 15:16:33
                                                                 How do you propose changing 'the current system' - Spanky KU - 9/27 15:59:02
                    Don't hold your breath waiting for an answer?(nm) - tman MU - 9/27 14:36:10




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard