You did not argue they should eliminate it all. When I said they should remove the protection, you posted this:
http://www.tigerboard.com/boards/view.php?message=17571680
Removal of Section 230 protection is not more government. It is the removal of at least one layer of it. And you argued it was more government. Your words meat. And now you cannot simply admit you were wrong. You want to change the argument. And this is because you are not only not as smart as you think you are, you lack an element of confidence and character that would have cleaned this up rather quickly.
Keep digging meat.