Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

Your point about the car thief is interesting and counter-

Posted on: March 8, 2021 at 10:06:46 CT
hokie VT
Posts:
68174
Member For:
9.67 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
10
productive for your argument.

If there is no government, there are no laws. Save you hypothetical natural laws.

So if in your naive utopia, a large person with a gun and a band of merry men takes your car by force, does he not "own" it? Who will step in to return the car to its original owner?

Who will punish the perpetrator?

Who will keep law and order?

Who will protect and care for the disabled, the sick and the needy?

I have posted before to no effect, that you and the idiots advocate for the laws of the serengeti plain. Natural law says the cheetah rules the antelope. The crocodile rules the zebra and the strong dominate the weak.

Who says cheetahs never win, by the way?

Or are there no bad people in your utopia?
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

In case anyone is so stupid to think govt can’t own property - hokie VT - 3/8 08:53:14
     why'd you leave the immigration discussion below? (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 3/8 09:34:16
          Start a new thread. nm - hokie VT - 3/8 09:59:22
     government can't own anything - ashtray UF - 3/8 09:27:21
          RE: government can't own anything - MUTGR MU - 3/8 10:19:26
               unresponsive (nm) - ashtray UF - 3/8 10:37:50
          That’s sweet, missy. Why don’t you and the other idiots - hokie VT - 3/8 09:35:25
               You're either ignorant to the phrase "put your money - kmawv8 MU - 3/8 09:40:02
               You're proving his point about the nature of govt, fyi. (nm) - ummmm MU - 3/8 09:36:47
                    his stupidity knows no bounds (nm) - ashtray UF - 3/8 09:37:37
     The point is that govt cannot have a legitimate ownership - ummmm MU - 3/8 09:23:58
          False(nm) - Spanky KU - 3/8 10:22:34
          Your point about the car thief is interesting and counter- - hokie VT - 3/8 10:06:46
               so many words from a starting point of ignorance - SwampTiger MU - 3/8 10:18:02
                    I certainly cannot refute an argument so articulate and - hokie VT - 3/8 10:22:57
                         offer stands as always, if you're confused just ask for help - SwampTiger MU - 3/8 10:43:45
               false premise (nm) - ashtray UF - 3/8 10:15:28
          Stupidity is pathetic, not perplexing. You and the idiots - hokie VT - 3/8 09:27:19
               I'm just trying to explain the position to you, because you - ummmm MU - 3/8 09:29:58
                    You state, "govt cannot own property" as if it were a - hokie VT - 3/8 09:58:05
                         it isn't an opinion, it's a fact - ashtray UF - 3/8 10:06:27
               what gives government legitimacy? (nm) - ashtray UF - 3/8 09:29:45
                    BOAISY - SwampTiger MU - 3/8 09:30:54
          what if it was gifted? - SwampTiger MU - 3/8 09:27:17
               Interesting question. - ummmm MU - 3/8 09:33:00
     nobody thinks the fed govt doesn't claim to own land (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 3/8 09:05:39
     Is someone really dumb enough to make that claim? - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 3/8 09:03:55
          Hint: rhymes with asstray. Hence the “stupidest poster” - hokie VT - 3/8 09:18:02
               That explains why I wouldn't know who said it(nm) - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 3/8 09:43:21
     Would this come from a certain poster who happens to think - DHighlander NWMSU - 3/8 09:00:03
          “government can't own property, nitwit (nm)” was the sum - hokie VT - 3/8 09:20:58




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard