Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

RE: Not if you read the words on the legislation

Posted on: February 9, 2021 at 16:05:34 CT
meatiger MU
Posts:
133094
Member For:
26.44 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
"for any person who is, or within the previous 10 years was, the subject of a terrorism investigation by any Federal department or agency"

If a tip by me puts you under investigation. You are impacted by this legislation for the next 10 years, regardless of the outcome of said investigation
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Lil Marco coming after the guns - El-ahrairah BAMA - 2/9 13:56:22
     I stopped reading here.... - MUTGR MU - 2/9 17:28:34
     I wondered if Marco was still alive - he has been quiet - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 2/9 15:46:37
          If you were in FL - meatiger MU - 2/9 16:06:09
     Impossible. There is a difference between R and D (nm) - pickle MU - 2/9 14:33:00
     Fvck you Marco, go back to Cuba...insane...nm - tigertix MU - 2/9 14:04:48
     Not what the legislation says - Spanky KU - 2/9 14:00:48
          that voids out the second amendment? - El-ahrairah BAMA - 2/9 14:09:18
               Where is the voiding of the 2nd amendment?(nm) - Spanky KU - 2/9 14:10:25
                    If somebody was investigated for terrorism - Sal MU - 2/9 14:24:18
                    “Shall not be infringed” - El-ahrairah BAMA - 2/9 14:13:17
                         Should a federal prisoner in a Super Max carry a gun? - Spanky KU - 2/9 14:23:28
                              “Shall not be infringed” (nm) - pickle MU - 2/9 14:33:27
                                   Are you saying a prisoner in a Super Max should be allowed - Spanky KU - 2/9 15:40:43
                              owning =/= carrying (nm) - kmawv8 MU - 2/9 14:27:20
                                   Split hairs much? The 2nd Amendment says "Bear Arms" - Spanky KU - 2/9 14:32:46
                              that's not what he said (nm) - ashtray UF - 2/9 14:25:54
                                   He said - Spanky KU - 2/9 14:27:04
                                        a prisoner in Super Max isn't "under investigation" - ashtray UF - 2/9 14:29:34
                                             he said ‘shall not be infringed’ - Spanky KU - 2/9 14:31:54
                                                  it means the federal government cannot pass a law - ashtray UF - 2/9 14:41:45
                                                       He was talking about the Constitution - Spanky KU - 2/9 17:37:19
                                                       Rubio isn’t talking about Supermax prisoners - El-ahrairah BAMA - 2/9 14:47:52
                                                            So are you saying if someone goes through Due Process - Spanky KU - 2/9 14:56:45
                                                            that fact eludes Spanky for some reason (nm) - ashtray UF - 2/9 14:55:39
                                                                 Nope,, Try again by answering the question: - Spanky KU - 2/9 15:18:09
                                                                      the opposite of what Marco is doing (nm) - ashtray UF - 2/9 15:20:32
                                                                           Try using your big boy words - Spanky KU - 2/9 15:33:37
                                                                                has nothing to do with prisoners, Spanky - ashtray UF - 2/9 15:39:50
                                                                                     Why won't you answer the question? - Spanky KU - 2/9 15:42:27
                                                                                          it's irrelevent (nm) - ashtray UF - 2/9 17:24:25
                                                                                               Dance away. "Shall not be infringed" escapes your - Spanky KU - 2/9 17:29:22
                                                                 He wants to expand his definition as much as possible - meatiger MU - 2/9 14:59:52
          that's worse. ?(nm) - gmmm98 MU - 2/9 14:08:25
          Isn't that the purpose of the original investigation? - meatiger MU - 2/9 14:07:26
               If the investigation wasn't completed?(nm) - Spanky KU - 2/9 14:10:47
                    The quote you gave said "was" - meatiger MU - 2/9 14:12:23
                         It was a poorly written article.. The actual text: - Spanky KU - 2/9 14:26:30
                              so now it is "is or was" - meatiger MU - 2/9 14:36:47
                                   Not really... read the words in the legislation - Spanky KU - 2/9 15:19:20
                                        Yes...I accuse you of terrorism plot - meatiger MU - 2/9 15:23:29
                                             Not if you read the words on the legislation - Spanky KU - 2/9 15:44:09
                                                  RE: Not if you read the words on the legislation - meatiger MU - 2/9 16:05:34
                                                       what happens then? Keep going.... you can do it..... - Spanky KU - 2/9 16:11:26
                                                            Any time you try to buy a firearm - meatiger MU - 2/9 16:15:08
                                                                 False - Spanky KU - 2/9 17:04:47
                              This would be a liberals wet dream - Sal MU - 2/9 14:35:52
                                   But it was introduced by an R - meatiger MU - 2/9 14:37:37
                              Rs against America? (nm) - ashtray UF - 2/9 14:26:51
                                   possibly(nm) - Spanky KU - 2/9 14:27:43
                                        lol (nm) - ashtray UF - 2/9 14:29:59
               Well stated.....nm - tigertix MU - 2/9 14:08:29
          A dem AG wouldbe arresting MAGA supporters on - tigertix MU - 2/9 14:06:57




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard