Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

Isn't that the purpose of the original investigation?

Posted on: February 9, 2021 at 14:07:26 CT
meatiger MU
Posts:
133094
Member For:
26.44 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
If this person was investigated but not charged or anything, why should there be another investigation without any new evidence...trying to obtain a firearm is not evidence.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Lil Marco coming after the guns - El-ahrairah BAMA - 2/9 13:56:22
     I stopped reading here.... - MUTGR MU - 2/9 17:28:34
     I wondered if Marco was still alive - he has been quiet - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 2/9 15:46:37
          If you were in FL - meatiger MU - 2/9 16:06:09
     Impossible. There is a difference between R and D (nm) - pickle MU - 2/9 14:33:00
     Fvck you Marco, go back to Cuba...insane...nm - tigertix MU - 2/9 14:04:48
     Not what the legislation says - Spanky KU - 2/9 14:00:48
          that voids out the second amendment? - El-ahrairah BAMA - 2/9 14:09:18
               Where is the voiding of the 2nd amendment?(nm) - Spanky KU - 2/9 14:10:25
                    If somebody was investigated for terrorism - Sal MU - 2/9 14:24:18
                    “Shall not be infringed” - El-ahrairah BAMA - 2/9 14:13:17
                         Should a federal prisoner in a Super Max carry a gun? - Spanky KU - 2/9 14:23:28
                              “Shall not be infringed” (nm) - pickle MU - 2/9 14:33:27
                                   Are you saying a prisoner in a Super Max should be allowed - Spanky KU - 2/9 15:40:43
                              owning =/= carrying (nm) - kmawv8 MU - 2/9 14:27:20
                                   Split hairs much? The 2nd Amendment says "Bear Arms" - Spanky KU - 2/9 14:32:46
                              that's not what he said (nm) - ashtray UF - 2/9 14:25:54
                                   He said - Spanky KU - 2/9 14:27:04
                                        a prisoner in Super Max isn't "under investigation" - ashtray UF - 2/9 14:29:34
                                             he said ‘shall not be infringed’ - Spanky KU - 2/9 14:31:54
                                                  it means the federal government cannot pass a law - ashtray UF - 2/9 14:41:45
                                                       He was talking about the Constitution - Spanky KU - 2/9 17:37:19
                                                       Rubio isn’t talking about Supermax prisoners - El-ahrairah BAMA - 2/9 14:47:52
                                                            So are you saying if someone goes through Due Process - Spanky KU - 2/9 14:56:45
                                                            that fact eludes Spanky for some reason (nm) - ashtray UF - 2/9 14:55:39
                                                                 Nope,, Try again by answering the question: - Spanky KU - 2/9 15:18:09
                                                                      the opposite of what Marco is doing (nm) - ashtray UF - 2/9 15:20:32
                                                                           Try using your big boy words - Spanky KU - 2/9 15:33:37
                                                                                has nothing to do with prisoners, Spanky - ashtray UF - 2/9 15:39:50
                                                                                     Why won't you answer the question? - Spanky KU - 2/9 15:42:27
                                                                                          it's irrelevent (nm) - ashtray UF - 2/9 17:24:25
                                                                                               Dance away. "Shall not be infringed" escapes your - Spanky KU - 2/9 17:29:22
                                                                 He wants to expand his definition as much as possible - meatiger MU - 2/9 14:59:52
          that's worse. ?(nm) - gmmm98 MU - 2/9 14:08:25
          Isn't that the purpose of the original investigation? - meatiger MU - 2/9 14:07:26
               If the investigation wasn't completed?(nm) - Spanky KU - 2/9 14:10:47
                    The quote you gave said "was" - meatiger MU - 2/9 14:12:23
                         It was a poorly written article.. The actual text: - Spanky KU - 2/9 14:26:30
                              so now it is "is or was" - meatiger MU - 2/9 14:36:47
                                   Not really... read the words in the legislation - Spanky KU - 2/9 15:19:20
                                        Yes...I accuse you of terrorism plot - meatiger MU - 2/9 15:23:29
                                             Not if you read the words on the legislation - Spanky KU - 2/9 15:44:09
                                                  RE: Not if you read the words on the legislation - meatiger MU - 2/9 16:05:34
                                                       what happens then? Keep going.... you can do it..... - Spanky KU - 2/9 16:11:26
                                                            Any time you try to buy a firearm - meatiger MU - 2/9 16:15:08
                                                                 False - Spanky KU - 2/9 17:04:47
                              This would be a liberals wet dream - Sal MU - 2/9 14:35:52
                                   But it was introduced by an R - meatiger MU - 2/9 14:37:37
                              Rs against America? (nm) - ashtray UF - 2/9 14:26:51
                                   possibly(nm) - Spanky KU - 2/9 14:27:43
                                        lol (nm) - ashtray UF - 2/9 14:29:59
               Well stated.....nm - tigertix MU - 2/9 14:08:29
          A dem AG wouldbe arresting MAGA supporters on - tigertix MU - 2/9 14:06:57




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard