Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

He certainly did

Posted on: February 4, 2021 at 15:09:57 CT
Spanky KU
Posts:
146272
Member For:
20.99 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
1
If he thought it not a charade, he would preside instead of allowing a partisan Senator who has already voiced support for conviction to be seated as the judge in the trial.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Will Trump testify under oath next week? - Ace AU - 2/4 13:57:06
     He should since he has been deplatformed by media(nm) - TigerFan92 STL - 2/4 14:32:21
     Is he protected by the 5th? - JayHoaxH8r MU - 2/4 14:14:28
     Why should he> The Unconstitutional Impeachment - Spanky KU - 2/4 13:59:45
          Why is it an unconstitutional impeachment?(nm) - miz_zou MU - 2/4 14:06:27
               Impeachment is to remove a sitting president - Spanky KU - 2/4 14:10:20
                    He was still the President when impeached. Roberts is not - miz_zou MU - 2/4 14:18:45
                         The Senate Trial is Unconstitutional..fair enough? - Spanky KU - 2/4 14:22:04
                              Roberts didn't make that decision - Ace AU - 2/4 14:34:18
                                   He certainly did - Spanky KU - 2/4 15:09:57
                              No, you’re wrong again(nm) - miz_zou MU - 2/4 14:24:43
                                   English is hard for you - Spanky KU - 2/4 14:27:49
                                        It doesn’t speak to it one way or the other-you’re wrong(nm) - miz_zou MU - 2/4 14:37:36
                                             It does. - Spanky KU - 2/4 14:40:16
                                                  Wrong again. And btw, this is what the constitution says: - miz_zou MU - 2/4 14:47:53
                                                       Where does the Constitution say that? - Spanky KU - 2/4 15:05:20
                                                            ^^^^crickets from miz_zou^^^^^^(nm) - Spanky KU - 2/4 15:53:01
                                                       the process is to remove a president. That process ends if - Spanky KU - 2/4 14:53:30
                                                            No, but keep digging in your echo chamber-lol(nm) - miz_zou MU - 2/4 15:04:28
                                                                 Keep dancing - Spanky KU - 2/4 15:05:44
                                        Clearly, you don't know how to read a legal document - Ace AU - 2/4 14:34:59
                                             Wrong. You fail to understand the meaning of 'and' vs 'or' - Spanky KU - 2/4 14:38:19
                    Nope, Spanky. I previously reproduced the relevant clause - Ace AU - 2/4 14:17:23
                         You failed then also(nm) - Spanky KU - 2/4 14:21:09




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard