Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

It does.

Posted on: February 4, 2021 at 14:40:16 CT
Spanky KU
Posts:
146460
Member For:
21.02 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
"Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States.”

If it meant that a former President could be convicted, it would say '...removal from Office, OR disqualification..'
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Will Trump testify under oath next week? - Ace AU - 2/4 13:57:06
     He should since he has been deplatformed by media(nm) - TigerFan92 STL - 2/4 14:32:21
     Is he protected by the 5th? - JayHoaxH8r MU - 2/4 14:14:28
     Why should he> The Unconstitutional Impeachment - Spanky KU - 2/4 13:59:45
          Why is it an unconstitutional impeachment?(nm) - miz_zou MU - 2/4 14:06:27
               Impeachment is to remove a sitting president - Spanky KU - 2/4 14:10:20
                    He was still the President when impeached. Roberts is not - miz_zou MU - 2/4 14:18:45
                         The Senate Trial is Unconstitutional..fair enough? - Spanky KU - 2/4 14:22:04
                              Roberts didn't make that decision - Ace AU - 2/4 14:34:18
                                   He certainly did - Spanky KU - 2/4 15:09:57
                              No, you’re wrong again(nm) - miz_zou MU - 2/4 14:24:43
                                   English is hard for you - Spanky KU - 2/4 14:27:49
                                        It doesn’t speak to it one way or the other-you’re wrong(nm) - miz_zou MU - 2/4 14:37:36
                                             It does. - Spanky KU - 2/4 14:40:16
                                                  Wrong again. And btw, this is what the constitution says: - miz_zou MU - 2/4 14:47:53
                                                       Where does the Constitution say that? - Spanky KU - 2/4 15:05:20
                                                            ^^^^crickets from miz_zou^^^^^^(nm) - Spanky KU - 2/4 15:53:01
                                                       the process is to remove a president. That process ends if - Spanky KU - 2/4 14:53:30
                                                            No, but keep digging in your echo chamber-lol(nm) - miz_zou MU - 2/4 15:04:28
                                                                 Keep dancing - Spanky KU - 2/4 15:05:44
                                        Clearly, you don't know how to read a legal document - Ace AU - 2/4 14:34:59
                                             Wrong. You fail to understand the meaning of 'and' vs 'or' - Spanky KU - 2/4 14:38:19
                    Nope, Spanky. I previously reproduced the relevant clause - Ace AU - 2/4 14:17:23
                         You failed then also(nm) - Spanky KU - 2/4 14:21:09




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard