Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

Yes, They NEED to hear and rule on it ffuture

Posted on: January 11, 2021 at 12:29:05 CT
Spanky KU
Posts:
145006
Member For:
20.86 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
2
elections. There is zero doubt that several state givernors/Sec States (and the PA Supreme Court) violated state law by modifying election procedures without going through the legislative process. SCOTUS needs to rule if that is allowable in the future...
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

SCOTUS again rejects Trump election cases- 1-63 - miz_zou MU - 1/11 12:11:37
     Search for truth is not valued it is demonized (nm) - TigerFan92 STL - 1/11 12:15:44
          The truth has already been found. The steal attempt is - SparkyStalcup MU - 1/11 12:49:30
     But I thought Trump made deals with specific justices - Sal MU - 1/11 12:15:32
          So did he, apparently nm - SparkyStalcup MU - 1/11 12:49:53
               we were told the justices were in on it - Sal MU - 1/11 12:51:33
                    I was more worried about the ACA. I figured the justices - SparkyStalcup MU - 1/11 12:54:32
                         So the "right thing" is only what you agree with - Sal MU - 1/11 12:55:48
                              The right thing in this case was to assess any evidence - SparkyStalcup MU - 1/11 12:59:56
                                   No, I have no idea what you're referring to - Sal MU - 1/11 13:54:23
          Pay attention - Mo Texan MU - 1/11 12:21:00
               No, both sides are full of idiotic conspiracy theories (nm) - Sal MU - 1/11 12:22:47
                    SMH @ Sal-it was a joke. Seriously you need help(nm) - Mo Texan MU - 1/11 12:25:38
                         I'm aware of what you were doing - Sal MU - 1/11 12:31:19
                         You just figuring that out?(nm) - miz_zou MU - 1/11 12:26:36
                              speaking of failing to follow along - Sal MU - 1/11 12:33:59
                                   How many followers will it take before you understand? - Toger STL - 1/11 12:40:35
     rejected 'fast tracking' the case - Spanky KU - 1/11 12:15:32
          Actually without comment(nm) - miz_zou MU - 1/11 12:19:08
               case not rejected... just the expedited hearing of the case. - Spanky KU - 1/11 12:20:57
                    Does that increase the credibility and honor of the case?(nm) - Toger STL - 1/11 12:22:42
                    You think they will hear it after 1/20/2021(nm) - miz_zou MU - 1/11 12:22:21
                         Yes, They NEED to hear and rule on it ffuture - Spanky KU - 1/11 12:29:05
                              Maybe you didn't notice there was a - Toger STL - 1/11 12:35:38
                                   Were the state legislators not working? Was there a legal - Spanky KU - 1/11 12:49:01
     Deep state judges posing as cons-great plan, but took years(nm) - Mo Texan MU - 1/11 12:13:48




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard