Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

SCOTUS again rejects Trump election cases- 1-63

Posted on: January 11, 2021 at 12:11:37 CT
miz_zou MU
Posts:
2498
Member For:
9.00 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
Supreme Court rejects fast track for Trump election cases
Mon, January 11, 2021, 8:55 AM CST

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Supreme Court on Monday formally refused to put on a fast track election challenges filed by President Donald Trump and his allies.

The court rejected pleas for quick consideration of cases involving the outcome in five states won by President-elect Joe Biden: Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

SCOTUS again rejects Trump election cases- 1-63 - miz_zou MU - 1/11 12:11:37
     Search for truth is not valued it is demonized (nm) - TigerFan92 STL - 1/11 12:15:44
          The truth has already been found. The steal attempt is - SparkyStalcup MU - 1/11 12:49:30
     But I thought Trump made deals with specific justices - Sal MU - 1/11 12:15:32
          So did he, apparently nm - SparkyStalcup MU - 1/11 12:49:53
               we were told the justices were in on it - Sal MU - 1/11 12:51:33
                    I was more worried about the ACA. I figured the justices - SparkyStalcup MU - 1/11 12:54:32
                         So the "right thing" is only what you agree with - Sal MU - 1/11 12:55:48
                              The right thing in this case was to assess any evidence - SparkyStalcup MU - 1/11 12:59:56
                                   No, I have no idea what you're referring to - Sal MU - 1/11 13:54:23
          Pay attention - Mo Texan MU - 1/11 12:21:00
               No, both sides are full of idiotic conspiracy theories (nm) - Sal MU - 1/11 12:22:47
                    SMH @ Sal-it was a joke. Seriously you need help(nm) - Mo Texan MU - 1/11 12:25:38
                         I'm aware of what you were doing - Sal MU - 1/11 12:31:19
                         You just figuring that out?(nm) - miz_zou MU - 1/11 12:26:36
                              speaking of failing to follow along - Sal MU - 1/11 12:33:59
                                   How many followers will it take before you understand? - Toger STL - 1/11 12:40:35
     rejected 'fast tracking' the case - Spanky KU - 1/11 12:15:32
          Actually without comment(nm) - miz_zou MU - 1/11 12:19:08
               case not rejected... just the expedited hearing of the case. - Spanky KU - 1/11 12:20:57
                    Does that increase the credibility and honor of the case?(nm) - Toger STL - 1/11 12:22:42
                    You think they will hear it after 1/20/2021(nm) - miz_zou MU - 1/11 12:22:21
                         Yes, They NEED to hear and rule on it ffuture - Spanky KU - 1/11 12:29:05
                              Maybe you didn't notice there was a - Toger STL - 1/11 12:35:38
                                   Were the state legislators not working? Was there a legal - Spanky KU - 1/11 12:49:01
     Deep state judges posing as cons-great plan, but took years(nm) - Mo Texan MU - 1/11 12:13:48




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard